Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kid Berwyn

(14,795 posts)
50. Looks like Barr Obstructed Justice
Fri Jan 27, 2023, 10:38 AM
Jan 2023
John Durham's secret criminal investigation reportedly involved Trump, not Clinton or the FBI

PETER WEBER
The Week, January 27, 2023

Excerpt…

When Durham and Barr made a very unusual trip to Italy in September 2019, "Italian officials — while denying any role in setting off the Russia investigation — unexpectedly offered a potentially explosive tip linking Mr. Trump to certain suspected financial crimes," the Times reports. Barr and Durham "decided that the tip was too serious and credible to ignore," but instead of assigning it to another prosecutor, Barr had Durham quietly investigate the matter, "giving him criminal prosecution powers for the first time."

"Durham never filed charges, and it remains unclear what level of an investigation it was, what steps he took, what he learned, and whether anyone at the White House ever found out," the Times adds. This "extraordinary fact" that Durham opened a criminal investigation of Trump "has remained secret," though "a garbled echo became public" when the Times, in October 2019, reported that Durham's review had become a criminal inquiry, presumably (but erroneously) because "Durham had found evidence of potential crimes by officials involved in the Russia inquiry."

Barr, "who weighed in publicly about the Durham inquiry at regular intervals in ways that advanced a pro-Trump narrative, chose in this instance not to clarify what was really happening," the Times notes.

Continues…

https://theweek.com/arizona/1020435/arizona-legislature-exempts-itself-from-state-public-records-law

A hearty welcome to DU, GGoss! Outstanding OP and thread!

Personally, I think Barr will claim he covered up for Trump in order to keep “Anti-Putin” national security operations secret, meaning don’t rock the boat wherein the rich get richer and the rest of humanity can drop dead.
Get thee to the greatest page malaise Jan 2023 #1
This sounds...important. Jack? What do you think? nt wiggs Jan 2023 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #44
and so ends the Bill Barr Rehabilitation and Bullshit Tour agingdem Jan 2023 #3
Certainly does short out the fog machine, 'eh? calimary Jan 2023 #7
Doubt it. Between the general public's usual indifference and the uselessness of much of the press.. Carlitos Brigante Jan 2023 #18
I wondered why he was so shrill and flopsweaty on Bill Maher. dchill Jan 2023 #28
He was, wasn't he. SergeStorms Jan 2023 #37
Yep Rebl2 Jan 2023 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #45
+1, uponit7771 Jan 2023 #55
K&R spanone Jan 2023 #4
K and R oasis Jan 2023 #5
The criminal trump enterprise. Lunabell Jan 2023 #6
"He has too much dirt on too many people for any consequences." You are correct. That is how the Escurumbele Jan 2023 #11
Yes. Lunabell Jan 2023 #12
Trump had access to classified information on anyone he wanted to inquire about. Real dirt. jalan48 Jan 2023 #15
Barr, Durham and Trump C_U_L8R Jan 2023 #8
K&R gademocrat7 Jan 2023 #9
And disballed! Meadowoak Jan 2023 #24
No use for those oysters anymore, anyway. erronis Jan 2023 #29
We will never fully uncover all the Trump crimes Johnny2X2X Jan 2023 #10
It could be a weekly series... lame54 Jan 2023 #14
Decades.... flying_wahini Jan 2023 #56
I've always said "Bernie Madoff wishes he was louis-t Jan 2023 #25
""this tip is too credible, we better cover it up ourselves"" bullimiami Jan 2023 #13
have the statutes run out on these so called crimes also that Barr covered up ? republianmushroom Jan 2023 #16
I think that there should be some kind of provision in the law for obstruction to extend statute Nictuku Jan 2023 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #46
Reminds me of this gem from a couple years ago. nattyice Jan 2023 #17
Thank You For This GGoss Jan 2023 #21
Tom forgot the hair dye running down Rudy's face. louis-t Jan 2023 #27
I don't think that had happened yet JHB Jan 2023 #31
Yeah, this one's from October 2019. nattyice Jan 2023 #35
the level of corruption of these treasonous motherfuckers is astounding LymphocyteLover Jan 2023 #19
"WHY THE FUCK DO THEY HATE AMERICA SO MUCH?" markodochartaigh Jan 2023 #20
OK, but when did so many conservatives become authoritarians willing to bow down to LymphocyteLover Jan 2023 #23
I grew up gay a half century ago in the reddest part of Texas. markodochartaigh Jan 2023 #30
so all these "grown-ups" are just afraid of the fucking GOP base? Even seasoned prosecutors? LymphocyteLover Jan 2023 #32
Occasionally I have heard corporate Republican politicians markodochartaigh Jan 2023 #38
Yes, that is no doubt true... but it's a not very satisfying explanation LymphocyteLover Jan 2023 #54
the NYTimes piece is explosive LymphocyteLover Jan 2023 #22
The outrage du jour. Who wants an honest bet that nothing happens. Boomerproud Jan 2023 #26
Nothing will happen. But still we must do our duty to spread the truth. LymphocyteLover Jan 2023 #34
Maybe Barr and Durham can share a cell after they are found guilty UpInArms Jan 2023 #36
*snort* Arrividerci, Guglielmo! tanyev Jan 2023 #39
Gift link to NYT article Qutzupalotl Jan 2023 #40
Weaponization of Government Marcuse Jan 2023 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #47
Justice, once thought to be blind, is now oblivious Zambero Jan 2023 #51
There is NO other story of consequence..imho..than the mcgonigle story.. asiliveandbreathe Jan 2023 #42
Bloviating Barr needs to be DISBARRED & behind BARS!! onetexan Jan 2023 #48
Recommended bagimin Jan 2023 #49
Looks like Barr Obstructed Justice Kid Berwyn Jan 2023 #50
Great Job billy !!! how did that investigation go ? RANDYWILDMAN Jan 2023 #52
I thought sitting presidents were off limits due to DOJ memos? suegeo Jan 2023 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bill Barr asked Italian o...»Reply #50