Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bill Barr asked Italian officials to discredit Russia probe -- they responded with evidence linking.. [View all]Kid Berwyn
(14,795 posts)50. Looks like Barr Obstructed Justice
John Durham's secret criminal investigation reportedly involved Trump, not Clinton or the FBI
PETER WEBER
The Week, January 27, 2023
Excerpt
When Durham and Barr made a very unusual trip to Italy in September 2019, "Italian officials while denying any role in setting off the Russia investigation unexpectedly offered a potentially explosive tip linking Mr. Trump to certain suspected financial crimes," the Times reports. Barr and Durham "decided that the tip was too serious and credible to ignore," but instead of assigning it to another prosecutor, Barr had Durham quietly investigate the matter, "giving him criminal prosecution powers for the first time."
"Durham never filed charges, and it remains unclear what level of an investigation it was, what steps he took, what he learned, and whether anyone at the White House ever found out," the Times adds. This "extraordinary fact" that Durham opened a criminal investigation of Trump "has remained secret," though "a garbled echo became public" when the Times, in October 2019, reported that Durham's review had become a criminal inquiry, presumably (but erroneously) because "Durham had found evidence of potential crimes by officials involved in the Russia inquiry."
Barr, "who weighed in publicly about the Durham inquiry at regular intervals in ways that advanced a pro-Trump narrative, chose in this instance not to clarify what was really happening," the Times notes.
Continues
https://theweek.com/arizona/1020435/arizona-legislature-exempts-itself-from-state-public-records-law
A hearty welcome to DU, GGoss! Outstanding OP and thread!
Personally, I think Barr will claim he covered up for Trump in order to keep Anti-Putin national security operations secret, meaning dont rock the boat wherein the rich get richer and the rest of humanity can drop dead.
PETER WEBER
The Week, January 27, 2023
Excerpt
When Durham and Barr made a very unusual trip to Italy in September 2019, "Italian officials while denying any role in setting off the Russia investigation unexpectedly offered a potentially explosive tip linking Mr. Trump to certain suspected financial crimes," the Times reports. Barr and Durham "decided that the tip was too serious and credible to ignore," but instead of assigning it to another prosecutor, Barr had Durham quietly investigate the matter, "giving him criminal prosecution powers for the first time."
"Durham never filed charges, and it remains unclear what level of an investigation it was, what steps he took, what he learned, and whether anyone at the White House ever found out," the Times adds. This "extraordinary fact" that Durham opened a criminal investigation of Trump "has remained secret," though "a garbled echo became public" when the Times, in October 2019, reported that Durham's review had become a criminal inquiry, presumably (but erroneously) because "Durham had found evidence of potential crimes by officials involved in the Russia inquiry."
Barr, "who weighed in publicly about the Durham inquiry at regular intervals in ways that advanced a pro-Trump narrative, chose in this instance not to clarify what was really happening," the Times notes.
Continues
https://theweek.com/arizona/1020435/arizona-legislature-exempts-itself-from-state-public-records-law
A hearty welcome to DU, GGoss! Outstanding OP and thread!
Personally, I think Barr will claim he covered up for Trump in order to keep Anti-Putin national security operations secret, meaning dont rock the boat wherein the rich get richer and the rest of humanity can drop dead.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bill Barr asked Italian officials to discredit Russia probe -- they responded with evidence linking.. [View all]
GGoss
Jan 2023
OP
Doubt it. Between the general public's usual indifference and the uselessness of much of the press..
Carlitos Brigante
Jan 2023
#18
"He has too much dirt on too many people for any consequences." You are correct. That is how the
Escurumbele
Jan 2023
#11
Trump had access to classified information on anyone he wanted to inquire about. Real dirt.
jalan48
Jan 2023
#15
have the statutes run out on these so called crimes also that Barr covered up ?
republianmushroom
Jan 2023
#16
I think that there should be some kind of provision in the law for obstruction to extend statute
Nictuku
Jan 2023
#43
the level of corruption of these treasonous motherfuckers is astounding
LymphocyteLover
Jan 2023
#19
OK, but when did so many conservatives become authoritarians willing to bow down to
LymphocyteLover
Jan 2023
#23
so all these "grown-ups" are just afraid of the fucking GOP base? Even seasoned prosecutors?
LymphocyteLover
Jan 2023
#32
Yes, that is no doubt true... but it's a not very satisfying explanation
LymphocyteLover
Jan 2023
#54
Nothing will happen. But still we must do our duty to spread the truth.
LymphocyteLover
Jan 2023
#34
There is NO other story of consequence..imho..than the mcgonigle story..
asiliveandbreathe
Jan 2023
#42