How long will you give Garland the benefit of the doubt?

[iemanja]

There's a clear difference between some posters already frustrated with the fact there hasn't been an indictment of Trump, while some say it's important we give him the benefit of the doubt--that an indictment will happen in time. My question is how long will you maintain that position?

Pick the longest length of time you are willing to continue to support Garland if an indictment has not yet been issued.

51 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	I'm already frustrated with the lack of an indictment
	35 (69%)
	In 3 months, I'll still be giving Garland the benefit of the doubt
	0 (0%)
	In 6 months, I'll still be giving Garland the benefit of the doubt
	0 (0%)
	In 12 months, I'll still be be giving Garland the benefit of the doubt
	0 (0%)
	In 18 months, I'll still be giving Garland the benefit of the doubt
	0 (0%)
	In 2 years, I'll still trust that Garland will indict Trump
	0 (0%)
	However long it takes
	15 (29%)
	I'll support Garland even if he never indicts Trump
	1 (2%)
	Other, explain below
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll