Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

gab13by13

(29,368 posts)

8. Not sure I follow,

Reply to MadameButterfly (Reply #7)

Thu Feb 16, 2023, 04:57 PM

Feb 2023

I live among Magats and I learned long ago to not argue, discuss, try to reason with them because they will never change and they will just drag you down in the gutter where they are experts.

No matter what Garland did those people will always believe that he is a $#@&^(&%&%%@^*( Democrat out to get Trump with a witch hunt.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Garland appointed Smith to conduct investigations: a simple hypothesis [View all] Eyeball_Kid Feb 2023 OP

and to isolate and insulate the investigation from agingdem Feb 2023 #1

☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️ PortTack Feb 2023 #2

It's not RICO, dammit! Fiendish Thingy Feb 2023 #3

Is RICO in legal cases the equivalent of lupus in an episode of House? n/t Silent3 Feb 2023 #4

I agree with why Garland appointed Smith, because of politics. gab13by13 Feb 2023 #5

+1 spot on! Emile Feb 2023 #6

yeah but there are those who genuinely believe MadameButterfly Feb 2023 #7

Not sure I follow, gab13by13 Feb 2023 #8