General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How many here knew that George Washington ordered slaughter of Indians during Revolutionary War? [View all]Honesty is the only way to really understand what we are dealing with.
But, even though this Matthew Cooke "justified" his viewpoint, as I am reading and knowing how complicated politics is, I wonder about if Washington is taking the fall for going with an "all out war" approach though he actually respected many of the Indians who he'd fought with in earlier conflicts.
I'm thinking to dig deeper and provide him with some more facts if that is the case and see if he is capable of seeing things as they are or is still wanting to sensationalize the tale more than be into the truth.
The PROBLEM I see with Faux Noise and the irrational narratives from the REICH is that the TRUTH is BORING.
When Government WORKS, it's boring.
No one dies because of bad regulations when Government puts in common sense policies.
When your tax dollars pay for road repair, you get where you are going, even if there is a lot of roadwork going on.
When people have enough to eat and a roof over their head, they are less likely to resort to crimes.
When the bottom 50% have enough money to pay their bills and buy necessities, the entire economy does better.
But that's BORING because it seems to be NO BIG DEAL when things are going well.
Isn't THAT WHAT IS SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN?
So what would make THAT news?
So if you are a news agency or wanting to promote a movie etc....
BORING PROGRESS is bad for business.
IF Matthew Cooke is really wanting things to change... he may be working himself OUT of a career.
Once things change and we are WOKE and getting along, and everyone KNOWS the actual history, he will have done his job and can step back. IS THAT THE GOAL?
I hope so.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):