Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is interesting, what...»Reply #21
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: This is interesting, what is behind this move? [View all]

brush

(54,443 posts)
21. Hope so. Someone else mentioned his lawyers might try to go judge shopping for a favorable judge.
Reply to Effete Snob (Reply #14)
Thu May 4, 2023, 05:09 PM
May 2023

Last edited Fri May 5, 2023, 11:38 AM - Edit history (2)

A trump-appointed one I assume.

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This is interesting, what is behind this move? [View all] imanamerican63 May 2023 OP
I think because the Statute of Limitations has expired? JenniferJuniper May 2023 #1
Completely irrelevant Effete Snob May 2023 #5
What clock is that? JenniferJuniper May 2023 #8
Yes Effete Snob May 2023 #13
Maybe so they can manipulate AnnaLee May 2023 #2
BINGO! RegulatedCapitalistD May 2023 #9
Probably something like that. He knows a NY jury would not be favorable to him. brush May 2023 #10
It would still be a New York jury Effete Snob May 2023 #14
Hope so. Someone else mentioned his lawyers might try to go judge shopping for a favorable judge. brush May 2023 #21
He only appointed 4 out of 41 in that district Effete Snob May 2023 #26
If he gets a federal conviction, a future president can pardon Maeve May 2023 #3
The first thing I would like to ask you is this.... Effete Snob May 2023 #4
Judge Shopping Beetwasher. May 2023 #6
Confuse, delay, irrelevant actions. The Orange Shitgibbons short playbook. NY courts'll handle him. marble falls May 2023 #7
Tell Trump that moving it there allows for the death penalty. LiberalFighter May 2023 #11
Is this the Jean Carrol case? Sanity Claws May 2023 #12
No it is the Bragg case. Bev54 May 2023 #15
Thanks for the explanation Sanity Claws May 2023 #17
No Effete Snob May 2023 #16
Thanks. Sanity Claws May 2023 #18
Thanks, I should have clarified that point my post! imanamerican63 May 2023 #19
Presumably the argument is that some of the charges arise from actions taken in 2017. onenote May 2023 #22
Yah Effete Snob May 2023 #24
It started as a federal case with Cohen and "Individual #1" tinrobot May 2023 #20
If Rump wants it, it has to be illegal, immoral, or just plain ill. Nt Baked Potato May 2023 #23
Because the state will not pardon him. nt usedtobedemgurl May 2023 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is interesting, what...»Reply #21
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.