Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Think. Again.

(22,456 posts)
7. So far no (actual) FF activists have DAMAGED anything.
Sun May 21, 2023, 05:35 PM
May 2023

I fully agree that cultural heritage sites and art should not be damaged, and all of the activists that have staged these performative actions seem to also agree.

Paintings were always protected by easily cleaned glass, substances used in other acts were also non-damaging and environmentally safe.

The action posted here consisted of vegetable charcoal dye that will not damage or stain anything other than the recycled water in the fountain, which is probably filtered on a regular basis, and is obviously harmless to the people in the fountain.

I ask that we all please consider the facts of these actions before helping to spread the disinformation that the fossil fuel industry wants the public to believe.

Oh, and, protecting the only life that we know of in the universe could be considered more important than really good paintings, don't you think?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sheer stupidity. highplainsdem May 2023 #1
Should've been naked. betsuni May 2023 #2
They may have convinced potential supporters to put their bucks elsewhere. quaint May 2023 #3
I honestly wonder what's actually behind this group. thucythucy May 2023 #4
In Berlin: dalton99a May 2023 #5
remember when the taliban newdayneeded May 2023 #6
So far no (actual) FF activists have DAMAGED anything. Think. Again. May 2023 #7
"protecting the only life that we know of in the universe could be considered more important" brooklynite May 2023 #8
yes.. Think. Again. May 2023 #10
but those discussions, including this one, are virtually never about climate change prodigitalson May 2023 #18
I see your point. Think. Again. May 2023 #19
or people engage in attention grabbing behavior and then there is a discussion about their behavior prodigitalson May 2023 #22
You've answered your own question. Think. Again. May 2023 #23
that video is a real knee-slapper RussBLib May 2023 #26
A Few Thoughts ProfessorGAC May 2023 #12
I believe ... Think. Again. May 2023 #14
my take away from this (and other such actions) stopdiggin May 2023 #16
Yes... Think. Again. May 2023 #20
Welcome to our DU family. niyad May 2023 #27
How exactly does this damage the art? FreeState May 2023 #9
It's Probably Just Carbon Black ProfessorGAC May 2023 #11
This staging of climate conferences in the name of climate awareness since 1995 . . . hatrack May 2023 #13
imagine... Think. Again. May 2023 #15
The irony is that one of the reasons Retrograde May 2023 #17
thinking of... Think. Again. May 2023 #21
So, there was no damage done. crickets May 2023 #24
Use squid ink. Duh. betsuni May 2023 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This damaging of art and ...»Reply #7