Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(57,863 posts)
2. I posted only one paragraph from Business Insider, and it wasn't opinion.
Sun May 21, 2023, 09:51 PM
May 2023

It was simply about how popular the chatbot is.

That MIT paper is essentially a puff piece for social chatbots in general and XiaoIce in particular. It stops just short of saying everyone should send XiaoIce flowers. Or maybe offer the bot sacrifices.

Two samples of how ridiculous that paper is:

XiaoIce wins the user’s trust and friendship with her wonderful sense of humor and empathetic responses to all sorts of questions

XiaoIce has such a superhuman “perfect” personality that is impossible to find in humans of the real world.


It's a bot. No one in their right mind should trust it, let alone view it as a friend. It has no real sense of humor, no real empathy.

And it sure as hell doesn't have a superhuman perfect personality.

Whoever wrote that paper needs to be deprogrammed from the XiaoIce cult.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Microsoft has a Chinese c...»Reply #2