Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ITAL

(1,206 posts)
31. Nuremberg Trials were different
Mon May 29, 2023, 05:09 PM
May 2023

The Soviets wanted show trials followed by executions. The British wanted summary executions with no trial. The United States fought for some sort of legitimate trial that could actually convince the German population the officials deserved death, rather than just revenge.


What Dana (who I referenced earlier) said was he wasn't at all sure he could win a legitimate trial in the 1860s. And a show trial wouldn't help with hearts and minds at all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why are you shouting? Ocelot II May 2023 #1
Personally, I don't think that's a good thing Marius25 May 2023 #2
Hmm... anciano May 2023 #3
What should've been done was the leading traitors, pols and generals should've been hung... brush May 2023 #5
Then the rest of the South would have hated us even more Polybius May 2023 #23
You don't know that. That's the reason you hang traitors. What happened... brush May 2023 #24
They wouldn't have "given up" if they were gonna be hanged ITAL May 2023 #25
BS. The south got beaten badly. Reconstruction with US troops... brush May 2023 #26
Think again ITAL May 2023 #27
All the verbosity and I have one question? brush May 2023 #28
Why? ITAL May 2023 #29
Guess you were against the Nurmberg Trials too? brush May 2023 #30
Nuremberg Trials were different ITAL May 2023 #31
Get real. You know very well I'm talking about holding traitors and war criminals accountable. brush May 2023 #33
... ITAL May 2023 #35
Only a tiny percent of Nazi leadership was executed or imprisoned. former9thward May 2023 #34
Your second sentence is very true. former9thward May 2023 #32
Lincoln, Gen Grant and Gen. Sherman...without them we'd... brush May 2023 #4
Nah. roamer65 May 2023 #6
Possible. But if the south had won because before Grant and Sherman... brush May 2023 #7
Some sort of banana republic. roamer65 May 2023 #8
So how is that different than it being a separate nation like I said? brush May 2023 #14
You asked what they would have done. roamer65 May 2023 #16
If they had won they would've been a separate nation. brush May 2023 #21
even on DU, even on this date stopdiggin May 2023 #9
Rome thought it would last forever, too. roamer65 May 2023 #10
so no point in trying, right? stopdiggin May 2023 #11
It will pass. roamer65 May 2023 #12
I think the 'conceit' stopdiggin May 2023 #17
That would be for people of said northern states to decide through referendum. roamer65 May 2023 #19
I don't want to call it "luck" when it was the work of thoughtful, courageous people FakeNoose May 2023 #13
But I always try to remember that those "accomplishments" came at a heavy price. roamer65 May 2023 #15
Yes of course, thanks for the reminder FakeNoose May 2023 #18
... roamer65 May 2023 #20
A couple of things BannonsLiver May 2023 #22
...."Full of people who hate each other"....quote...How full is that? Yes, lots of people but the Stuart G May 2023 #36
You don't think or haven't noticed the country is divided? BannonsLiver May 2023 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GIVEN HISTORY OF THE U.S...»Reply #31