Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PatrickforB

(14,613 posts)
29. Dear Simeon - This is due to the primacy of the shareholder doctrine - a legal
Tue Jul 18, 2023, 06:54 PM
Jul 2023

doctrine that was established by the Michigan Supreme Court in a 1919 ruling against Henry Ford and in favor of the Dodge brothers.

Since Ford's new assembly line allowed the factory to put out a much greater number of cars, Ford reasoned that since they were producing more, he needed to expand his market more so a greater number of people could purchase the cars.

So, he raised the wages of the factory workers to the point where they could afford to purchase the cars they built.

The Dodge brothers owned shares in Ford Motor Company and sued Henry Ford on the basis that the 'unreasonably high wages' for his factory workers deprived them of PROFITS to which they were ENTITLED as shareholders. And they won. Seriously.

Thus was born the legal doctrine of 'shareholder primacy' - the shorthand is profits-over-people, and that is quite true.

So the CEO of UPS, Carol Tome, 'earned' (if you can call it that) a base salary of $1,336,251 per year, starting in 2021 with total compensation of $27,620,893. Her job as CEO of a publicly held company is ONLY, and I stress ONLY to increase shareholder profits.

This is why most CEOs are sociopaths, because this system rewards sociopathic behavior. Consider:

If you are Carol, the first thing you are going to do is work to cut labor costs. This means you will try to bust the union if at all possible in as many facilities as possible, will cut hours so you don't have to provide that many benefits, and you'll cut corners on working conditions (like not heating or cooling this facility where you and your friends must toil). And you'll contract with companies and lowball the contract prices, which forces them to cut wages and benefits for their drivers, as well.

And, as you say, you don't care if your workers have to get foodstamps or welfare. Not your problem. In fact, according to a study a few years ago, a Walmart store can cost a community upwards of $900K per year in public benefits paid to employees who could not otherwise live on the wage. Walmart lied, of course, and disputed this.

Of course, this also has ramifications for consumers of the service or product the company produces as well as the environment. I won't go into that in depth except to say that the GOP particularly is keen to pass on any costs of corporate malfeasance to taxpayers while allowing the corporation to pocket all profits.

This is why I hate our brand of capitalism. It is literally destroying the earth. If you look at BLS and Census data, you can see wages have remained stagnant for many years, while productivity has risen and corporate profits are stratospheric.

The bottom line is that this system, coupled with the 'trickle down' tax cuts and the bloated Military Industrial complex, sucks (it does SUCK) but as I say, it sucks up wealth and systematically transfers it to fewer and fewer people. This is why we can't 'afford' Medicare for all Americans, which 68% of us favor, and Social Security is not as solvent as it might be. It is also why Congress does NOTHING about gun control even though an overwhelming majority of us want gun controls because, silly us, we don't want our grandkids to be gunned down in a school shooting. It is also why our carbon emissions are rapidly making the planet uninhabitable.

It's all ALWAYS about policy. Congress should be ready to actively mitigate these corporate excesses, but rulings like Citizens United have allowed corporate corruption to nearly bury our republic under Wall Street greed.

OK, rant over...........good luck and best wishes to you!

As

Thank you for your excellent analysis of UPS, my dear Simeon Salus. CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2023 #1
Good! Elessar Zappa Jul 2023 #2
If workers were treated fairly and with respect, unions might not be necessary in the first place. calimary Jul 2023 #3
THIS! THIS! THIS! OMGWTF Jul 2023 #6
This has never been the case. Jakes Progress Jul 2023 #22
They only start to act that way when faced with a union vote SouthernDem4ever Jul 2023 #27
Absolutely Bear Creek Jul 2023 #48
Could we pass a law that employers must reimburse the government here? raging moderate Jul 2023 #4
Excellent idea Hekate Jul 2023 #7
Isn't there a law stating such already on the books, or is it state-by-state only? Hestia Jul 2023 #13
Wouldn't the people still be eligible for aid whether they worked there or not? MichMan Jul 2023 #50
Are you sharing personal info of real people? leftstreet Jul 2023 #5
Calling this weird is weird. NBachers Jul 2023 #14
Well it is weird leftstreet Jul 2023 #20
I have changed names and swapped some circumstances in order not to identify fellow union members. Simeon Salus Jul 2023 #24
So the Shakira wasn't the singer? leftstreet Jul 2023 #26
The only time it will be an exciting time ( I assume you meant exciting) for labor SouthernDem4ever Jul 2023 #28
First, changed names, like I said. Simeon Salus Jul 2023 #33
Excellent description of working conditions and why we need unions Wild blueberry Jul 2023 #8
The lady who is our regular delivery person at my work is fantastic. tanyev Jul 2023 #9
Thanks for this post - great first hand insights. I totally support unions. n/t iluvtennis Jul 2023 #10
I'm happy that the Teamsters are already established at UPS FakeNoose Jul 2023 #11
Thanks to the GQP Congresses that allowed them to get away with the take-aways Hestia Jul 2023 #15
Minimum wage in 1990 was $3.80 per hour MichMan Jul 2023 #19
This all began with MOMFUDSKI Jul 2023 #12
Businesses skirt paying and working employees with Full Time pay and Benefits should be flying_wahini Jul 2023 #16
It's called *Algorythms* setting pay and schedule - managers hide behind the old Hestia Jul 2023 #23
Thank you for posting this. Duppers Jul 2023 #17
I'm with you. Joinfortmill Jul 2023 #18
I love our UPS driver hueymahl Jul 2023 #21
They also need to terminate this man, if he is still there. The Grand Illuminist Jul 2023 #25
I think he's still there maspaha Jul 2023 #34
Dear Simeon - This is due to the primacy of the shareholder doctrine - a legal PatrickforB Jul 2023 #29
Carol Tome is the CEO of UPS IcyPeas Jul 2023 #30
Beautifully said & explained Simeon DENVERPOPS Jul 2023 #31
I am also a former UPSer... maspaha Jul 2023 #32
Every person I have met in the last 25 years that worked at UPS said their SouthernDem4ever Jul 2023 #35
If a large company like UPS is hurting and in danger of going under DFW Jul 2023 #36
Insert Katie Porter and Jamie Dimon here... DJ Porkchop Jul 2023 #49
Delivery Drivers NowISeetheLight Jul 2023 #37
A good read about UPS from back in January Deminpenn Jul 2023 #38
My son was a part-time specialist at UPS for years ... rustysgurl Jul 2023 #39
I'm surprised UPS still has any workers given the working conditions and low pay described here MichMan Jul 2023 #40
And if they weren't union... 2naSalit Jul 2023 #41
I too worked at UPS Johnny2X2X Jul 2023 #42
K and R...Thanks for posting.. Stuart G Jul 2023 #43
Thanks was talking to my grandson (27) about this Tree Lady Jul 2023 #44
second to last entry here llashram Jul 2023 #45
It's the same thing for retail. Companies have gotten into the habit of running their businesses cstanleytech Jul 2023 #46
What can the Public do... zentrum Jul 2023 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why I walked out at UPS a...»Reply #29