Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(37,467 posts)
7. Aside from isolated cases like this with a known hereditary disease, where genetic counseling is appropriate,
Wed Jan 17, 2024, 07:59 PM
Jan 2024

Or situations in which the entire gene pool is very, very limited (not just the couple, but an isolated community with lots of intermarrying), the most recent research indicates that there is very little difference in genetic health between marriage of unrelated individuals and between first cousins.

The most recent studies suggest that random couples have a 2-4% chance of an inherited disease, whereas first cousins have a 3.7-6.8% chance. NYTimes

There are diseases where there is a lot of risk, far more than that which comes from a marriage among cousins, and there is no prohibition on (for example) people with Tay Sachs, Huntington's Disease, Marfan syndrome, Achondroplasia marrying. Two African American individuals have a higher risk of sickle cell anemia than average, and there isn't a suggestion they should be prohibited from marrying.

Not to mention that not every marriage results in children.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Incest... Not... Opps... Strike That [View all] NowISeetheLight Jan 2024 OP
Must've got lucky EYESORE 9001 Jan 2024 #1
There is more sexual abuse in families than other social construction Stargazer99 Jan 2024 #2
It's legal to marry your 1st cousin in CA, NY, and MA Jose Garcia Jan 2024 #3
As it is in 27 other states (without restriction in 24, with some restrictions in 6). Ms. Toad Jan 2024 #6
If it was good enough for Queen Victoria and Charles Darwin Retrograde Jan 2024 #4
There's a disease called CMT. Butterflylady Jan 2024 #5
Aside from isolated cases like this with a known hereditary disease, where genetic counseling is appropriate, Ms. Toad Jan 2024 #7
"Not to mention that not every marriage results in children" Silent3 Jan 2024 #9
That would open up a whole bunch of cans of worms . . . Ms. Toad Jan 2024 #10
I see what you mean about "eugenics", but "eugenics" bad name came from racist assumptions... Silent3 Jan 2024 #14
It's not just racism. Ms. Toad Jan 2024 #18
First cousins are not a problem. SYFROYH Jan 2024 #8
Are you aware the First Cousin marriage is legal in..... brooklynite Jan 2024 #11
I'M SUPRISED THE USUAL SUSPECT catsudon Jan 2024 #17
No, they're on the list too brooklynite Jan 2024 #19
Cornelius Vanderbilt married his first cousin, Sophia Johnson, and they bore 13 children together. PufPuf23 Jan 2024 #12
I remember back years ago when I was a young Emile Jan 2024 #13
First cousin marriage is legal in a lot of states. Elessar Zappa Jan 2024 #15
Yup. Oddly enough, not Kentucky n/t TexasBushwhacker Jan 2024 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Incest... Not... Opps... ...»Reply #7