Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(2,357 posts)

25. So does this mean that a state can't keep an underage or non-citizen from getting on the POTUS ballot?

Mon Mar 4, 2024, 11:43 AM

Mar 4

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

SCOTUS reverses the Colorado Supreme Court, keeping Trump on the ballot [View all] In It to Win It Mar 4 OP

Shocked. Shocked, I tell you. Scrivener7 Mar 4 #1

When everyone disagrees with you, sometimes its you. brooklynite Mar 4 #6

That's nice, dear. Scrivener7 Mar 4 #7

Meanwhile, Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson still disagree with you. brooklynite Mar 4 #16

The post made perfect sense Tickle Mar 4 #30

9-0 vote Johnny2X2X Mar 4 #2

No dissents. brooklynite Mar 4 #3

We can't allow GQP to have 1 state disqualify our dem candidate lindysalsagal Mar 4 #4

Section 3 is not very well written. NYC Liberal Mar 4 #8

They did. former9thward Mar 4 #11

It doesn't say that. NYC Liberal Mar 4 #14

My copy says that. former9thward Mar 4 #18

That allows Congress to pass legislation to enforce the provisions. NYC Liberal Mar 4 #20

There have been many laws passed by Congress to enforce the 15th. former9thward Mar 4 #24

Sure, but both amendments were self-executing. NYC Liberal Mar 4 #28

The amendment does not say anything about ballot access. LeftInTX Mar 4 #22

It's in the opinion Shrek Mar 4 #21

Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson: dalton99a Mar 4 #5

My impression is that the majority doesn't leave this "open ended". LeftInTX Mar 4 #15

Don't vote for them Tickle Mar 4 #31

Asserting SCOTUS jurisdiction for national elections bucolic_frolic Mar 4 #9

Well, there it is. Hugin Mar 4 #12

I know it's a 9-0 decision but it is OBVIOUSLY flawed. Goodheart Mar 4 #13

What it does today, the Court should have left undone dweller Mar 4 #19

A little out of context onenote Mar 4 #23

I didn't read the entire opinion, but that's a good question LeftInTX Mar 4 #26