Justice for JFK

[Octafish]

444. Speaking of logic...

...what the Washington Post wrote on Jan. 6, 1979, regarding the HSCA's conclusions of conspiracy:

Could it have been some other malcontent who Mr. Oswald met casually? Could not as much as three or four societal outcasts with no ties to any one organization have developed in some spontaneous way a common determination to express their alienation in the killing of President Kennedy? It is possible that two persons acting independently attempted to shoot the President at the very same time.

It is odd, the lengths certain circles have to go and contort in order to arrive at the necessary conclusion for business to continue as usual: "Move along, folks. Nothing to see here. The suspect is apprehended and awaiting trial. Er, burial."

Doing that is what you, MrMickeysMom, and I would call "Justice." Unless we work to learn all the facts -- whether they support one contention or another, one theory or another, one suspect or many -- and letting the People examine them, it is not Justice.

PS: Michael Parenti in his 1996 address on The JFK Assassination: Defending the Gangster State spells out the Big Picture.

Text version: http://www.michaelparenti.org/JFKAssassination.html

Audio version (scroll down or word-search "gangster&quot : http://www.tucradio.org/parenti.html

PS: A belated Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours, MrMickeysMom! I am infinitely grateful for Friends like you.