General Discussion

Bobstandard

(1,305 posts)

23. Except for the fact that there is no action

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #11)

Thu Mar 28, 2024, 10:40 AM

Mar 28

There are lies, damned lies, and semantics.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Can't DOJ Indict John Eastman and Jeffrey Clark [View all] gab13by13 Mar 28 OP

Because grand juries indict. marble falls Mar 28 #1

You get my point. gab13by13 Mar 28 #2

Eastman's been indicted already, not by the Feds, but he has been recommended for prosecution to DoJ ... marble falls Mar 28 #3

That is one hell of a cop out then by DOJ gab13by13 Mar 28 #6

And...he's going to be recommended by the law bar to be disbarred. PortTack Mar 28 #12

Needs to be locked up behind bars for at least 10 years MichMan Mar 28 #14

Clark won't need his law degree working for Trump, gab13by13 Mar 28 #19

They are literally planning the next one. onecaliberal Mar 28 #26

Garland refusing to prosecute Republicans that are sabotaging our democracy is most definitely partisan. nt Trueblue Texan Mar 28 #4

No action yet / no comment is NOT the same as "refusing" Bernardo de La Paz Mar 28 #11

Except for the fact that there is no action Bobstandard Mar 28 #23

I'm calling you on that. Post links to "lies and damned lies" on the part of the DoJ Bernardo de La Paz Mar 28 #24

semantics Nutty Putty Mar 28 #25

Welcome to DU. I'm not defending DoJ as strongly as you might think, but regardless, I'm not embarrassed. . . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 28 #27

Telling n/t Nutty Putty Mar 28 #30

"Telling"? You've got nothing or you would have posted it. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 28 #33

Yes. Apologists Nutty Putty Mar 28 #35

He's federalist society. He's protecting them. onecaliberal Mar 28 #29

He's too afraid of being called partisan by the right. Trueblue Texan Mar 28 #42

I'm of another opinion. onecaliberal Mar 28 #44

Might look partisan Bettie Mar 28 #5

Why has TSF not been indicted edhopper Mar 28 #7

Pomerantz and Dunne worked 2 years building a case for financial fraud gab13by13 Mar 28 #8

Once again, you don't know what you don't know Fiendish Thingy Mar 28 #9

It could easily be that DoJ doesn't want to upset the tRump case in DC. Plus they Bernardo de La Paz Mar 28 #10

Garland is too busy to pursue these criminals. jaxexpat Mar 28 #13

And Smith wanted to move faster.. surfered Mar 28 #15

I already said that, did you read my thread? gab13by13 Mar 28 #17

I never said that I know what I don't know. gab13by13 Mar 28 #16

Co-conspirators have not been indicted due to DOJ (Jack Smith) strategy Jersey Devil Mar 28 #18

I already said that, I agree with you, gab13by13 Mar 28 #21

I presume there are hundreds of Rod Rosensteins still within DOJ Ponietz Mar 28 #40

Now that we know things are not speedy, they should be indicted. onecaliberal Mar 28 #31

Ignore the nut in the brown shirt. usonian Mar 28 #20

Can't or WON'T? Wild blueberry Mar 28 #22

So far I have gotten one possible reason: discovery. gab13by13 Mar 28 #28

Recommend, onecaliberal Mar 28 #32

You must have forgotten the lesson of that old... dchill Mar 28 #34

Nope, believe it or not, gab13by13 Mar 28 #36

Hands must appear to be clean... dchill Mar 28 #38

This is another way of asking my question, gab13by13 Mar 28 #37

Not enough manpower, gotta investigate Hunter Biden's peepee first 617Blue Mar 28 #39

To political. republianmushroom Mar 28 #41

Answer: Defendants aren't convicted based on "we know he's guilty".... brooklynite Mar 28 #43