Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Trump's Bond Insurer Doesn't Seem To Have The $175M It's Guaranteeing [View all]Ocelot II
(126,019 posts)88. I assume this whole dodgy deal will be considered by the court.
The fact that the insurance company isn't licensed to do business will be brought up; it looks like they tried to tack it to a separate company owned by the same holding company and get away with it that way - along with the even more concerning fact that it doesn't seem to have the required amount of cash to cover the bond.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Trump's Bond Insurer Doesn't Seem To Have The $175M It's Guaranteeing [View all]
Tom of Temecula
Apr 2024
OP
Of course, Trump's bond insurer's reserves were inflated and they can't do business in NY.
sop
Apr 2024
#2
We already did that in 2020. That fuck will run again and again until it dies.
onecaliberal
Apr 2024
#53
If they are not certified to do business in NY wouldn't there be a problem?
LiberalFighter
Apr 2024
#61
The reason actually was that those 30 insurers wouldn't take real estate as collateral,
Ocelot II
Apr 2024
#83
Not really. They refused due to the size of the loan and that RE was not acceptable
SlimJimmy
Apr 2024
#86
The ten day period to respond applies to everyone. It's part of the NY Civil Procedure Rules
onenote
Apr 2024
#25
I've started keeping my mouth shut about this part because I know nothing about it.
Orrex
Apr 2024
#75
Levine is the "expert" lawyer that mistakenly claimed that what was missing were Trump's financial records
onenote
Apr 2024
#41
Looks like the same type of financial shenanigans Trump was found guilty of at trial
dlk
Apr 2024
#38
How about the delay since it was supposed to be posted, plus the 10 days for the challenge?
Hermit-The-Prog
Apr 2024
#70
True, they lowered the amount by 49%. But by reading this, the company bonding trump is not lic. in NY
republianmushroom
Apr 2024
#68