Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Supreme Court is not interpreting existing law [View all]TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)33. I don't think I said anywhere that Roe was wrongly decided
Only that others have argued it wasnt consistent with the Constitution. An example is this article https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/06/john-hart-ely-dobbs-roe-legacy.html#
I will say that I think Roe should have remained in place.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The SCOTUS ruling in the 14th Amendment disqualification issue was also largely dicta
LetMyPeopleVote
May 2024
#25
If TSF returns to the WH, expect to see "Brown v Board of Education" overturned.
no_hypocrisy
May 2024
#45