Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Simeon Salus

(1,524 posts)

3. 1864 must have seemed a particularly bad year to be an incumbent President, with an increasingly unpopular war

Reply to Simeon Salus (Reply #1)

Wed Jul 10, 2024, 07:38 PM

Jul 2024

The war was in its fourth long year and casualty lists were longer than ever before.

Lincoln's re-election was a near thing. But for the Union's 1864 military successes McClellan might have won more states.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

August 1864 Quotes [View all] ITAL Jul 2024 OP

Lincoln did not run for re-election as a Republican in November 1964 Simeon Salus Jul 2024 #1

Technically, correct ITAL Jul 2024 #2

1864 must have seemed a particularly bad year to be an incumbent President, with an increasingly unpopular war Simeon Salus Jul 2024 #3

Agreed ITAL Jul 2024 #4

Yeah, in August the war was bogged down Wednesdays Jul 2024 #5