Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

meadowlander

(4,645 posts)
Sun Jul 21, 2024, 02:43 PM Jul 21

This is why we need to be able to openly discuss facts, regardless of who the nominee is. [View all]

I understand that a lot of people are genuinely heart-broken and shocked about this.

But I also think there's a number of people on (and no longer on) this site who have been trying to explain why they thought this was a likely outcome for several weeks now and they've been subjected to some pretty shocking abuse by their fellow DUers as well as targeted campaigns to get their accounts banned.

Meanwhile, the worst kind of conspiracy theories and weak arguments have been flourishing in the vacuum. I've watched as first many people stopped believing in polls, then the media, then our elected representatives and for some people even the democratic system of government. Some people are obviously still there.

And it's a shame, because if we'd been able to have this conversation and everyone had been able to make their cases, then today might well not have come as the inexplicable shock that it seems to be to some. And we would have a much shorter hill to be pushing the next candidate up without fighting against headwinds of cynicism fuelled by making this about a donor or media conspiracy/coup or drive to cancel votes when it was always simply about the majority of ordinary Democratic voters losing faith in the ability of a candidate that they love and respect to sustain the energetic messaging necessary to beat Donald Trump.

49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
+1000 nt Fiendish Thingy Jul 21 #1
+10000 nt TheSocialDem Jul 21 #2
I felt it was coming, but I didn't want it to. alarimer Jul 21 #3
I can understand how you feel. meadowlander Jul 21 #5
Maybe so alarimer Jul 21 #7
Those numbers pre-dated the debate by months. meadowlander Jul 21 #8
The vast majority of regular Dem Voters wanted Biden to step Aside nt DontBelieveEastisEas Jul 21 #24
I don't believe that at all alarimer Jul 21 #42
So, we may be voting for... lame54 Jul 21 #4
DU did pretty good by me ThreeNoSeep Jul 21 #6
I thought events and circumstances were extremely clear Sympthsical Jul 21 #9
Totally agree and very well put. meadowlander Jul 21 #10
Plus, if people were relying on this Forum to be informed, they were wearing green sunglasses like the visitors to DontBelieveEastisEas Jul 21 #25
Post removed Post removed Jul 21 #11
I don't think you're the victim here. Duncan Grant Jul 21 #12
It's not about claiming victimhood. It's about asking for some self-reflection. meadowlander Jul 21 #13
Just stop. Emrys Jul 21 #16
I'll stop when the conspiracy theories and misinformation does meadowlander Jul 21 #19
Go touch some grass. I have. n/t Emrys Jul 21 #20
People who have multiple posts hidden and the hides not overturned on appeal Prairie Gates Jul 21 #23
This. ms liberty Jul 21 #30
Not here to relitigate this meadowlander Jul 21 #46
"Reflection for thee, but not for me," IOW Prairie Gates Jul 21 #47
How was describing what I honestly saw at the debate treating people poorly? meadowlander Jul 21 #49
The rules here Zeitghost Jul 21 #14
CORRECT! Goodheart Jul 21 #35
You wrongly equate continued support for the nominee WE voted for... W_HAMILTON Jul 21 #15
No, I support being able to have an open, civil conversation about it, regardless of who people support. meadowlander Jul 21 #18
The time for that was during the primary. W_HAMILTON Jul 21 #27
Situations change and we need to be able to respond to them. meadowlander Jul 21 #44
The facts couldn't be rejected because the facts were not allowed. DontBelieveEastisEas Jul 21 #22
"We could say that there is no praise for keeping a candidate such as Biden on the ticket." W_HAMILTON Jul 21 #28
Many of those that voted for Biden, changed their mind when they saw evidence of his current abilities. DontBelieveEastisEas Jul 21 #33
Post removed Post removed Jul 21 #34
Absolutely correct. Goodheart Jul 21 #38
I think you fail to realize that a vote in a primary is not the one that ultimately matters. Goodheart Jul 21 #36
Yours is probably the stronger point. Both are true. Things change and Biden is Great nt DontBelieveEastisEas Jul 21 #37
There was a lot of denial, all around. Wingus Dingus Jul 21 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author DontBelieveEastisEas Jul 21 #26
I have been making this point for weeks. Many didn't know that a majority of all Dem Voters wanted Biden to Step Aside DontBelieveEastisEas Jul 21 #21
And let me add that silencing those voices allowed this to be framed as an attack on Biden Ms. Toad Jul 21 #29
I couldn't even state the fact that recent polling said "AVERAGE Dems" wanted him to step aside. DontBelieveEastisEas Jul 21 #39
Yup. Ms. Toad Jul 21 #41
Some people have a long history ibegurpard Jul 21 #31
I tried to argue respectfully that Joe should step aside and got punished for it. Goodheart Jul 21 #32
How dare you... Xolodno Jul 21 #45
I'm glad you're back. Abolishinist Jul 21 #48
Wow, did you find fault with EarlG's master thread then? My understanding of it was definitely not that it was... lostnfound Jul 21 #40
EarlG is entitled to his opinion like everyone else on this board. meadowlander Jul 21 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is why we need to be...