Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

scipan

(2,679 posts)
34. This is a good article
Thu Aug 1, 2024, 11:45 PM
Aug 2024
Do we need to be worried about rogue election officials disrupting the 2024 election?
Yes and no. As the Rolling Stone article noted, and as Marc Elias explained in his latest column, “we are going to see mass refusals to certify the elections” because the GOP is “counting on the fact that if they don’t certify in several small counties, you cannot certify these statewide results.”

Such refusals to certify local elections by rogue election officials are certainly going to cause a headache, but the important thing is that there are processes to ensure each election is properly certified.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Marc Elias has said they won't succeed in stealing the election mucifer Aug 2024 #1
Maybe trump will have a heart attack ... Trueblue1968 Aug 2024 #35
Voter suppression. It's a bit easier if they throw the voters off the lists. They are fucking criminals madinmaryland Aug 2024 #2
I imagine it would just keep the electoral votes from being certified for the state ColinC Aug 2024 #3
We have two county supervisors in Arizona's Cochise County who tried it in 2020 dobleremolque Aug 2024 #31
To them they are martyrs I guess. To me, it's another no good POS going to jail ColinC Aug 2024 #36
Basically this ITAL Aug 2024 #4
great post Celerity Aug 2024 #5
There are more variables at play than you describe. Fiendish Thingy Aug 2024 #7
They could try ITAL Aug 2024 #11
Nothing was delayed past the December "safe harbor" date in 2020 Fiendish Thingy Aug 2024 #13
Well ITAL Aug 2024 #14
Well, of course, all defendants get their day in court Fiendish Thingy Aug 2024 #25
As I understood it, it doesn't have to just be swing states where magats can not certify and screw up the works... royable Aug 2024 #8
That honestly wouldn't really matter much ITAL Aug 2024 #12
County elections boards will refuse to certify their vote tallies, block the certification of the state's vote totals Fiendish Thingy Aug 2024 #6
In MI, the board of state canvassers will then certify the results Kaleva Aug 2024 #27
Thank you - no speculation required Fiendish Thingy Aug 2024 #33
Biden, Harris, and the Administration ain't stupid Wednesdays Aug 2024 #9
I honestly don't think they have some grand plan that has a real chance to succeed. Some GOPers might hope Silent Type Aug 2024 #10
I believe they most definitely DO have MULTIPLE plans in place... Think. Again. Aug 2024 #15
THIS B.See Aug 2024 #17
That's why we have Democratic election officials and poll watchers. I think they can/will handle it. Silent Type Aug 2024 #19
If the choice is between cheating and jail... kentuck Aug 2024 #20
Also it's pretty much the same people duncang Aug 2024 #16
But that trick didn't work then, and it won't work now. Agree it COULD complicate things, but we Silent Type Aug 2024 #21
Agreed..... anciano Aug 2024 #22
Democracy Docket piece about this today. Heron5 Aug 2024 #18
This is a good article scipan Aug 2024 #34
This Rachel Maddow piece from Monday is chilling. Snarkoleptic Aug 2024 #23
AG Garland will take care of it lol Sewa Aug 2024 #24
"I believe they most definitely DO have MULTIPLE plans in place..." J_William_Ryan Aug 2024 #26
What are your plans if it doesn't turn out ok? Kaleva Aug 2024 #28
My hunch is their plan involves Sheriffs, Qutzupalotl Aug 2024 #29
It's illegal for county officials not to certify votes by a certain date. lees1975 Aug 2024 #30
I looked into what should happen - the laws and procedures scipan Aug 2024 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can someone explain how t...»Reply #34