Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There is a post on the Greatest page, spreading harmful misinformation , with 53 recs. [View all]ShazzieB
(22,057 posts)87. You are completely missing the point here.

Trump may very well have said that. I would definitely not put it past him. But that is NOT the issue here. The issue is the contents of Jack Smith's COURT FILING that was unsealed by Judge Chutkan yesterday
In that court filing, that particular remark was NOT attributed to Trump. It was attributed to someone else. In quoting anything from the court filing, we should all be careful to attribute statements quoted in it to the person they are attributed to in the court filing. That applies across the board to all the people who are quoted in there, INCLUDING Trump.
No one here is claiming that there's no possibility Trump ever said, "Make them riot." What we are saying is that Jack Smith did NOT attribute that quote to him in the court filing. It is therefore inaccurate, incorrect, and misleading to claim or even imply that Smith was quoting Trump there.
I don't know how to make this any clearer. If you still don't understand what the issue is, I am at
a loss, because I don't know how to explain it any better.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There is a post on the Greatest page, spreading harmful misinformation , with 53 recs. [View all]
Fiendish Thingy
Oct 2024
OP
And Weissman's wrong about that. He was careless and spread misinformation there.
highplainsdem
Oct 2024
#10
I re-watched and found it this time. And Weissman is 100 percent wrong. Page 8, which he cites could not be more clear
onenote
Oct 2024
#21
I think he got it wrong because he did a rush reading/interpretation of the 160-something page filing.
iluvtennis
Oct 2024
#86
I'm so glad you posted this. I knew I wasn't losing my mind and I'd heard that on Nicole's show
Native
Oct 2024
#73
What's that got to do with the misattributed quote from Smith's report?
Fiendish Thingy
Oct 2024
#11
another poster who can't make a point of disagreement without accusing the other person of being a 'trumper'
bigtree
Oct 2024
#99
you called me that. You called me a 'trumper.' No one who actually knows me has the temerity to insult me so
bigtree
Oct 2024
#101
Agree. We don't need to disseminate misinformation to win this thing. But don't think it will stop anyone.
Silent Type
Oct 2024
#4
Totally agree. On the other hand, wouldn't want someone to say they got bad info here.
Silent Type
Oct 2024
#54
He read it within minutes of it dropping so let's cut him some slack, he got it wrong.
Bev54
Oct 2024
#77
That post was specifically referring another thread posted by the person I was replying to
Fiendish Thingy
Oct 2024
#31
Seriously, Weisman quoted it wrong, within minutes of it dropping and him trying to pull
Bev54
Oct 2024
#78
At first, yes, then after about 12 hours of outcry on this thread and the OP, it was edited. Nt
Fiendish Thingy
Oct 2024
#94
I just visited one of those threads and spent 10 minutes trying to source that quote. It should be removed.
Runningdawg
Oct 2024
#29
Yeah, I take your word for that-- I read the story elsewhere and noticed it was not totally clear
Jack Valentino
Oct 2024
#51