Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Interesting - but who do you recommend? GoneOffShore Dec 2011 #1
Dennis is about the only one speaking out these days. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2011 #4
Dennis has proposed some pretty attractive ideas. LoZoccolo Dec 2011 #6
What an indictment you just made of the broken system, unintentionally I'm sure, we live under. sabrina 1 Dec 2011 #18
Well said! New7up Dec 2011 #135
If Dennis Kucinich looked like Josh Brolin would he have gotten further? Mimosa Dec 2011 #206
joke, big joke. dennis wouldn't last a month once they started in on him. okieinpain Dec 2011 #229
Ah, but he has been active in his government roll. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2011 #25
Good to see you recycling your DU2 material. Union Scribe Dec 2011 #29
Yes. With the Citizen's United decision in place, only candidates sanctioned by the 1% Zorra Dec 2011 #122
Very true, judging from what I saw from inside the Kucinich campaign in 2004 Lydia Leftcoast Dec 2011 #150
Unintentionally, you know, you just described Obama's 2008 presidential platform... RandomKoolzip Dec 2011 #240
Dennis and Sanders I trust completely. emilyg Dec 2011 #32
He knows better than to mess with an incumbent Democratic President Freddie Stubbs Dec 2011 #78
Huh? New7up Dec 2011 #136
Raul Grijalva texshelters Dec 2011 #119
when someone says that it's a strong clue that they don't know enough about individual congress cali Dec 2011 #127
I haven't seen anything posted here, AFAIR. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2011 #237
Dennis is viewed as an eccentric crackpot banned from Kos Dec 2011 #151
Only by the far right. sabrina 1 Dec 2011 #152
DK is fine as an obscure House member - he is just not presidential material. banned from Kos Dec 2011 #157
He IS presidential material and was the most popular candidate for that office sabrina 1 Dec 2011 #161
Well, I don't want to argue but you wrote your post with passion and conviction. banned from Kos Dec 2011 #179
Ditto. The Tim Russet/UFO debate is all the tape u need to hang him. zonkers Dec 2011 #209
Post removed Post removed Dec 2011 #20
He sure does sound like a thoughtful man.. midnight Dec 2011 #36
Al Gore Octafish Dec 2011 #52
Agreed on all points. ThomWV Dec 2011 #72
Al Gore is Mr. DLC himself. Remember its the Clinton machine that spawned the "Blue Dogs". Erose999 Dec 2011 #74
Blue Dogs were in existence long before Clinton. He just did more. LiberalFighter Dec 2011 #245
whack job, really? themadstork Dec 2011 #59
so, why is dennis a "whack job?" newspeak Dec 2011 #97
If Dennis was serious DonCoquixote Dec 2011 #121
Yes, the MSM did everything possible to make Dennis lok like an ass. dotymed Dec 2011 #144
other nominees are: Hulk Dec 2011 #106
What, or who is stopping them? sufrommich Dec 2011 #107
Elizabeth Warren, Howard Dean, Jerry Brown, Mark Udall, Barbara Boxer... mckara Dec 2011 #128
I'm with you on Howrd Dean Ned_Devine Dec 2011 #142
Those are viable choices. And electable if there was a chance of them running. GoneOffShore Dec 2011 #148
well, of course there's no chance- every single pol you mentioned supports Obama , even Bernie. Capn Sunshine Dec 2011 #214
In order to express dissatifaction with Obama, Kermit the Frog will do Jack Rabbit Dec 2011 #129
+1 nt ooglymoogly Dec 2011 #154
This would never happen, but thescreaminghead Dec 2011 #133
See bankrupcy "reform" and get back to us. TheKentuckian Dec 2011 #162
Rocky Anderson bonnieS Dec 2011 #149
Yes The Justice party ecoalex2 Dec 2011 #184
Yes swilton Dec 2011 #247
Kucinich speaks for progressive democrats. sabrina 1 Dec 2011 #155
I'm a fan of Bernie Sanders RyanPsych Dec 2011 #174
Sanders is not a Democrat Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2011 #196
There Must be someone who won't be a chameleon like Obama ecoalex2 Dec 2011 #178
I would vote for Russ in a heartbeat. n/t nebenaube Dec 2011 #221
Yeah, good luck with that...nt SidDithers Dec 2011 #2
Well, him or Kermit are bound to split the party! n/t Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #175
Why ProSense Dec 2011 #3
Nice strawman DesMoinesDem Dec 2011 #24
I can only ask, Did you vote for him. olegramps Dec 2011 #143
Yep DesMoinesDem Dec 2011 #195
Obama has succeeded in killing a lot more of our dedicated enemies than Bush did. olegramps Dec 2011 #250
Wrong war Union Scribe Dec 2011 #30
It does get confusing with so many going on... midnight Dec 2011 #35
Name them. The Doctor. Dec 2011 #84
You too... The Doctor. Dec 2011 #88
what does that have to do with anything? Skittles Dec 2011 #109
Yawn. Harper's becoming obsolete, needs attention? nt babylonsister Dec 2011 #5
it's not as if the author doesn't know what the result of that would be bigtree Dec 2011 #7
oh, I don't know paulk Dec 2011 #19
who's your Humphrey? bigtree Dec 2011 #37
the Democratic Party isn't going to nominate anyone outside of the establishment, actually paulk Dec 2011 #46
For, at least the last 2 1/2 years,many of us on DU and elsewhere have been dotymed Dec 2011 #147
You need to read a little history. ooglymoogly Dec 2011 #156
Careful! The Doctor. Dec 2011 #86
And we all know what happened to McCarthy. n/t Bonhomme Richard Dec 2011 #8
This is one huge pile of steaming bull shit Motown_Johnny Dec 2011 #9
we ended up with Nixon because the Democratic elites screwed McCarthy. provis99 Dec 2011 #15
I'm not slurring liberals, I am slurring that article Motown_Johnny Dec 2011 #31
McCarthy never had a snowball's chance in hell. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2011 #198
You are eliding so much history with the statement that "after this challenge coalition_unwilling Dec 2011 #28
Wow... Motown_Johnny Dec 2011 #39
You allege that, because McCarthy mounted his challenge to LBJ, we ended up coalition_unwilling Dec 2011 #44
Very well said. nt hifiguy Dec 2011 #61
my point is Motown_Johnny Dec 2011 #62
Since you're fond of referencing Wikipedia, I'd like to point you to another Wikipedia article: coalition_unwilling Dec 2011 #65
Bravo for the voice of reason here. Hart2008 Dec 2011 #222
+1 Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2011 #201
Bingo. ....almost every credible poltiical scientist now argues that Humphrey would have defeated MADem Dec 2011 #98
Exactly right. Zoeisright Dec 2011 #40
Your grasp of the political history of 1968 is hifiguy Dec 2011 #60
agreed Motown_Johnny Dec 2011 #63
+1 n/t jaysunb Dec 2011 #211
+1 n/t FSogol Dec 2011 #66
Under this reasoning, if Gingrich had a "(D)" after his name, would you support him? AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2011 #71
Obama is doing a damn fine job of being a President GinGrinch himself. NDAA, the continuing of Erose999 Dec 2011 #77
LBJ lost the presidency by pushing civil rights legislation through congress, ending the nearly 40 Warren Stupidity Dec 2011 #153
Gingrich will not be the nominee ooglymoogly Dec 2011 #160
It's all about what John R MacArthur wants to happen. Hidden deep in his mind. LiberalFighter Dec 2011 #246
I'm kinda unhappy with Obama & the current batch of Dems. I've made no secret of it. Jackpine Radical Dec 2011 #10
/thread. boxman15 Dec 2011 #21
At what point does a primary become inevitable? EOTE Dec 2011 #57
How 'bout voting for the lesser of two evils & then Jackpine Radical Dec 2011 #70
I don't think that's worked at all these past 30+ years. EOTE Dec 2011 #90
I guess I'm looking outside "politics as usual" to find my agents of change. Jackpine Radical Dec 2011 #91
+1 n/t jaysunb Dec 2011 #212
Well said IMO! Exactly what is/will happen. RKP5637 Dec 2011 #254
This message was self-deleted by its author Maven Dec 2011 #112
the election of 1968 is a great example in no small part because nixon won. unblock Dec 2011 #11
Wake up people ...they don't give a fuck about us. Poor people don't finance political campaigns. L0oniX Dec 2011 #12
If all poor people voted it would be a slam dunk for the dems every four years and we would still demosincebirth Dec 2011 #16
Not necessarily, as we were reminded in 2000 and probably again in 2004 sad sally Dec 2011 #22
It can be done (nt) T S Justly Dec 2011 #13
BS spanone Dec 2011 #14
Lol, BS to what? In '68, Gene and Bobby showed it can be done (nt) T S Justly Dec 2011 #17
This isn't '68 OhioBlue Dec 2011 #26
No, but the landscape is the same - unpopular U.S. military offenses, mass civil uprisings ... T S Justly Dec 2011 #38
The landscape isn't remotely the same onenote Dec 2011 #67
Well (and factually) said. n/t jaysunb Dec 2011 #213
Lazy, lazy, lazy... brooklynite Dec 2011 #23
The dude must be smoking a lot of something OhioBlue Dec 2011 #27
Do you remember who was actually elected that year? LiberalAndProud Dec 2011 #33
Humphrey could have been elected if he would have chosen to oppose the war, or say that he did. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2011 #75
How do you know this? LiberalAndProud Dec 2011 #82
How? An application of logic and common sense. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2011 #92
All I know is that the rightward slide has been inexorable. LiberalAndProud Dec 2011 #104
I was in high school when robert kennedy was killed newspeak Dec 2011 #101
Humphry was a good man, but he would not take a public position contrary to the war hawks. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2011 #114
Said the spider to the fly frazzled Dec 2011 #34
No, thanks. Name a challenger and I'll work even harder to support President Obama. NYC Liberal Dec 2011 #41
If he has overwhelming support Occulus Dec 2011 #68
x2 Absolutely right. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2011 #76
I'm not speaking for anyone else; only for me. I haven't said "Do you want President Newt." NYC Liberal Dec 2011 #103
This seems to be different he has the "overwhelming support of the liberal base of the party" AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2011 #115
He does... nt NYC Liberal Dec 2011 #120
right or wrong, good or bad - there is not even a .00001% chance that it is going to happen Douglas Carpenter Dec 2011 #42
If I could recommend a reply, it would be this one. I will wish with you. LiberalAndProud Dec 2011 #110
Real turds are more productive than this article. nt BootinUp Dec 2011 #43
I'm open to it. joshcryer Dec 2011 #45
Dumping an incumbent Democratic president, who has high approvals ratings... MrScorpio Dec 2011 #47
. ProSense Dec 2011 #48
MacArthur tells it like he sees it. Octafish Dec 2011 #49
Funny--When someone asked me why I thought O had shown no interest in taking on the MIC, Jackpine Radical Dec 2011 #255
Interesting how little changes over time sharp_stick Dec 2011 #50
Don't Compare Obama To The Almighty. Compare Him To The Alternative. DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2011 #51
Halfway between right and wrong is still wrong. Occulus Dec 2011 #85
Halfway Between Newt Gingrich Or Mitt Romney Is Still Fascism DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2011 #87
Any point between those two is just crazy Occulus Dec 2011 #227
You Do Know The Next President Will Be Barack Obama Or His Republican Opponent DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2011 #248
I prefer to compare him.. sendero Dec 2011 #203
This thread deserves to be dumped. tallahasseedem Dec 2011 #53
This is TRIPE old tripe and odorous...fuck this dude opihimoimoi Dec 2011 #54
unfortunately, the party leadership will only run who they want fascisthunter Dec 2011 #55
I've predicted for a while he won't be the nominee. BlueIris Dec 2011 #56
Whatever. This billionaire trust fund baby tool... jefferson_dem Dec 2011 #58
LOL. dreams die hard, don't they.... dionysus Dec 2011 #64
He does, but there is no alternative. The only person who can beat him isn't interested. Tatiana Dec 2011 #69
"Granted, there are big differences between 1968 and 2012" ProSense Dec 2011 #73
I dunno about the primary challenge, but Obama does remind me of Carter in some ways. bemildred Dec 2011 #79
Stupid is as stupid does. MjolnirTime Dec 2011 #80
Here's the deal ProSense Dec 2011 #83
I don't think it bolsters any new anti-Obama sentiment. MjolnirTime Dec 2011 #100
+1 dionysus Dec 2011 #102
This message was self-deleted by its author Bunny Dec 2011 #81
Kick Obama Out? JGug1 Dec 2011 #89
Indeed he does. K&R Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2011 #93
While I largely agree with this Carolina Dec 2011 #94
Don't you Know You Can't Post That on DU3? MineralMan Dec 2011 #95
but iread that DU3 was Big Brother "stifling dissent" and "censoring"! dionysus Dec 2011 #96
Guess not... MineralMan Dec 2011 #99
Dump Johnson gave us Nixon. Yeah, great plan. nt mistertrickster Dec 2011 #105
Johnson and Humpty gave us Nixon with their war. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2011 #132
The war that was widely popular in 1968? mistertrickster Dec 2011 #163
Anyone who was voting against the war wouldn't, and didn't, vote for Nixon or Humphrey. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2011 #169
Sirhan Sirhan Gave Us Nixon NashVegas Dec 2011 #191
Yep (nt) T S Justly Dec 2011 #235
There simply is no good solution to Obama.... samplegirl Dec 2011 #108
Ah, the wee whiff of W wafts through the bog. Efilroft Sul Dec 2011 #111
That about sums it up - and I wholeheartedly agree. nt gateley Dec 2011 #123
K&R (n/t) a2liberal Dec 2011 #113
As an Arizona voter texshelters Dec 2011 #116
This article texshelters Dec 2011 #117
We must do like the republicans nineteen50 Dec 2011 #118
This is the polar opposite of a cranky Tea Party rant against Romney. JohnnyRingo Dec 2011 #124
Please explain to me SixthSense Dec 2011 #125
Let me save a couple thousand words: JohnnyRingo Dec 2011 #189
+1000 n/t jaysunb Dec 2011 #218
Good Lord, those pictures should say it all Number23 Dec 2011 #225
good one. "no one except Fox News promised he would be a liberal dream once in office" certainot Dec 2011 #186
Well said ! n/t jaysunb Dec 2011 #220
According to Turley the ONLY pro-civil liberties candidate is the LIBERTARIAN Ron Paul! alp227 Dec 2011 #126
While replacing obama may or may not be a good idea with a more liberal democratic cstanleytech Dec 2011 #130
there may never be a better point SixthSense Dec 2011 #134
Well I believe our best choice is to cstanleytech Dec 2011 #137
my beliefs here are SixthSense Dec 2011 #139
Its not that Obama has refused solutions because he has its that the republicans stonewall him and cstanleytech Dec 2011 #158
What's the excuse for the first two years then? SixthSense Dec 2011 #166
Yup they controlled them but not enough to totally block the republicans from cstanleytech Dec 2011 #172
ROFL Scurrilous Dec 2011 #131
This message was self-deleted by its author cstanleytech Dec 2011 #138
I guess Karmdillo samplegirl Dec 2011 #140
+1 blkmusclmachine Dec 2011 #141
MMhmm just vote Republican save the drivel Veracious Dec 2011 #145
If he votes for the NDA, I won't vote for him. n/t Atypical Liberal Dec 2011 #146
Which is a vote for Romney bjobotts Dec 2011 #171
Or Ron Paul. Or nobody. Atypical Liberal Dec 2011 #241
Where's the "rec" button? nt Deep13 Dec 2011 #159
Where's the un-rec? otohara Dec 2011 #182
I remember the "Clean for Gene" movement. annabanana Dec 2011 #164
The point about Eugene McCarthy zentrum Dec 2011 #165
Not good enough to actually be in Harper's of course. gulliver Dec 2011 #167
you noticed that too... dionysus Dec 2011 #180
Eugene McCarthy's protege and heir: Darcy Richardson 2012- The only game in town to dump Obama Hart2008 Dec 2011 #168
Who? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2011 #205
The Progressive Democrat running for President of the United States of America! NT Hart2008 Dec 2011 #215
Like all presidents huh bjobotts Dec 2011 #170
If Obama gets a primary challenge, the GOP wins LuckyTheDog Dec 2011 #173
You know this for a fact??? Psychic, I guess nt HarryPowell Dec 2011 #192
Historical perspective (nt) LuckyTheDog Dec 2011 #239
Third time Ill be able to vote for president Charlemagne Dec 2011 #176
Pretty Much... K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2011 #177
yeah, better stay home and not vote certainot Dec 2011 #181
Yes he is otohara Dec 2011 #183
"i can't believe all the recs, must be a lot of folks not paying attention.... or trolls..." Number23 Dec 2011 #202
There's nothing wrong with DU Cali_Democrat Dec 2011 #223
And you say this as someone who obviously knows 99% of the population? Number23 Dec 2011 #224
Keep in mind that over 70% of Americans thought Saddam was behind 9/11 at one point Cali_Democrat Dec 2011 #226
"Overall, Americans are dumber than a sack of hammers." Number23 Dec 2011 #230
cali dem is right- there's a difference - the US is aggressively misinformed starting with a radio certainot Dec 2011 #232
rat wing radio has a big say on those percentages you both talk about. certainot Dec 2011 #231
Unfortunately, he'll be running against a Republican Warpy Dec 2011 #185
No he doesn't warrior1 Dec 2011 #187
I say, yes HarryPowell Dec 2011 #188
Agree 100%. REC. nt bertman Dec 2011 #190
Nostalgic for Eugene McCarthy? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2011 #193
And it got us that s--thead Nixon! 47of74 Dec 2011 #194
Somewhat disappointed that this post has so many recs. tabatha Dec 2011 #197
Go for it...Primary this President...or let him lose for lack of support... Ivywoods55 Dec 2011 #199
This is probably the dumbest damn thing I have EVER read Number23 Dec 2011 #200
The ProSense Dec 2011 #207
I agree wholeheartedly! Ivywoods55 Dec 2011 #210
PERFECTLY said, Prosense Number23 Dec 2011 #216
Give Me A Break cyberspirit Dec 2011 #204
Well said. n/t ProSense Dec 2011 #208
+1000 ellisonz Dec 2011 #217
All I can say is canetoad Dec 2011 #219
MacArthur - another blogosphere backseat whiner. CakeGrrl Dec 2011 #228
Stupid article, stupid suggestion BklnDem75 Dec 2011 #233
My first thought on reading article was remembering that McCarthy didn't get nominated... Mimosa Dec 2011 #234
K & R Raksha Dec 2011 #236
McCarthy was a perennial joke like Nader. This is fringe nonsense bullshit. Find the planet. RBInMaine Dec 2011 #238
Smart for Hillary Right-Of-The-Isle Dec 2011 #242
But you support Rick Perry, so why should YOU care? n/t jenmito Dec 2011 #243
What did it get us back then? LiberalFighter Dec 2011 #244
many of the recs are from people who NEVER post ecstatic Dec 2011 #249
BTTT Scurrilous Dec 2011 #251
OK I give = ? grantcart Dec 2011 #252
BTTT: Back To The Top. Scurrilous Dec 2011 #253
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama Richly De...»Reply #35