Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FSogol

(47,544 posts)
13. Squawk? When the mushy headed fans of fox news ask me that,
Fri Mar 21, 2025, 06:25 AM
Mar 2025

I reply that we have environmental review and public comment time build into projects. Should we avoid considering impact on the environment, communities, and ignore safety considerations?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yup. TSF is focused on obsolescence RainCaster Mar 2025 #1
Heehee! Can't wait. brush Mar 2025 #4
the cargo is containerized rampartd Mar 2025 #2
Right. Still has to be offloaded. brush Mar 2025 #3
It's already in service, for about a year and a half now unblock Mar 2025 #5
Quicker and cheaper would be nice to see too. EarnestPutz Mar 2025 #6
If what I'm reading is accurate... mwooldri Mar 2025 #9
If they can build it that quickly, why is it taking California so long to build theirs ? n/t MichMan Mar 2025 #12
Squawk? When the mushy headed fans of fox news ask me that, FSogol Mar 2025 #13
Panamanian environment doesn't matter ? MichMan Mar 2025 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author FSogol Mar 2025 #28
It is true that right wingers cannot stop talking about California high speed rail failures Prairie Gates Mar 2025 #22
May be the same reason Fla. has been delayed -- rights of way purchases. When the older railways allegorical oracle Mar 2025 #14
California? There's a Pacific coast but no isthmus connecting the Gulf of Mexico to it. brush Mar 2025 #17
California High Speed rail project that was promised to be complete by 2020 MichMan Mar 2025 #18
Oh, you're talking about something that has nothing to do with... brush Mar 2025 #20
Your OP is regarding a rail line from Mexico to the Panama Canal. MichMan Mar 2025 #21
I wrote the OP. IT's about an alterate railway that connects... brush Mar 2025 #24
Your headline is sure confusing.... MichMan Mar 2025 #26
Ok, I see what you mean. Some may read it as to Panama rather than... brush Mar 2025 #27
Many newer ships are too large for the Panama Canal RetiredRNIowa Mar 2025 #7
I was there as an exchange student 60 years ago and the canal was pretty much obsolete by then Walleye Mar 2025 #10
Water levels in the Panama Canal SusieCreamcheese Mar 2025 #8
Can the U.S. warships be carried on railcars? 😁 Wonder Why Mar 2025 #11
Yes, yes they can. yagotme Mar 2025 #19
Glad to see Mexico making progress like this. Paladin Mar 2025 #16
Stupid power plays encourage people to come up with smarter solutions to overcome the bullshit. David__77 Mar 2025 #23
This alternate to the Panama Canal makes Mexico a much more... brush Mar 2025 #25
It's a great opportunity to split or aggregate cargo. hunter Mar 2025 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wow! Just learned that Me...»Reply #13