General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gov Whitmer gets schooled by Trump-Dems be warned [View all]SunSeeker
(56,358 posts)I was not "skipping over" your question. The reason I replied to your question to NNadir about Whitmer's speech is to address what I think is the main reason people are upset with how her White House visit went down, and I think bickering over her speech misses the main point. People are upset because she allowed herself to get played as an Oval Office prop. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/disaster-gretchen-whitmers-talk-tariffs-meeting-trump-anger-fellow-dem-rcna200530
Even Whitmer realized it was a disaster, trying to cover her face from the cameras in this now viral photo from that day:
https://www.newsweek.com/gretchen-whitmer-accused-trying-hide-viral-oval-office-photo-2059183
But if you must know specifically what I personally (I can't speak for NNadir) didn't like about her speech, it is that she was giving Trump way too much credit, and even adopting Trumps vomitous "Golden Age" talking point (as if him gilding up the Oval Office wasn't bad enough) and the "cut red tape" bullshit.
...
Thankfully, Republicans, Democrats, and industry leaders came together to do something about it. During President Trumps first term, we started a serious national conversation about semiconductor manufacturing. A few years later, Congress passed bipartisan legislation to bring chip manufacturing back home. Im grateful to so many in our congressional delegation who fought hard to get it across the finish line.
We didn't lose manufacturing because of "red tape." That is a right wing talking point. We lost manufacturing because workers in other countries are willing to work for pennies on the dollar compared to American workers. And she made it sound like Trump was responsible for the CHIPS Act, but it was one of Bidens signature achievements. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHIPS_and_Science_Act
In fact, Trump is trying to undermine the CHIPS Act by illegally taking the billions the Act allocated for bringing microchip manufacturing back to the US.
But other than that, her speech was fine. Like I said, her speech was not the main issue.
Edit history
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):