Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The differences between Socialism & Communism [View all]TacosUberAlles
(88 posts)39. Are you the manager?
I don't know what your deal is but kindness is free.
Kindly go be abusive elsewhere.
All I did was share something which I found educational & is a "hot button issue" right now. Jeez.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Socialism is the strategy for future communist regimes to lure the people to vote for them
Escurumbele
Jun 27
#3
Both Russia and China were communist societies but they both failed because communism...
brush
Jun 27
#8
Interesting thread and that's why so many voices on this issue. Exactly what a good discussion is.
Deuxcents
Jun 27
#52
We (I live in Sweden) are NOT democratic socialist nations here in the Nordics.
Celerity
Jun 29
#120
Communism, like socialism, liberalism, conservatism, etc comes in many different flavors.
Ping Tung
Jun 27
#5
There has never been a successful socialist or communist society that has thrived and is still extant.
brush
Jun 27
#7
The tread was about the seeming confusion of socialism vs social democracies. in Europe.
brush
Jun 27
#43
So you think success is a vicious socialist dictatorship where the vast majority of people live in oppressed poverty.
SunSeeker
Jun 29
#97
A "vicious dictatorship where the vast majority of people live in oppressed poverty" perfectly describes Cuba.
SunSeeker
Jun 29
#114
Your 2008 opinion piece from "Liberation School" does not dispute anything the 2025 Harvard report says.
SunSeeker
Jun 29
#122
Heehee. Yugoslavia, China, Warsaw Pac. Please. Yugoslavia doesn't exist anymore and China is capitalist.
brush
Jun 27
#27
Slaves can be part of socialist economies as well. Nazis used slave labor in their socialist economy.
SunSeeker
Jun 28
#84
Yep, they copied Yugos SEZ and scaled it and still allowed rich to take from poor and middle
uponit7771
Jun 28
#70
China is a socialist country, according to the Webster's Dictionary definition of socialism.
SunSeeker
Jun 28
#63
There is nothing free about the enterprise in China. It is all state controlled.
SunSeeker
Jun 28
#68
"subject to the whims" .... That's 100% of all US corps if "whims" is the deciding factor. China has SOE cause they have
uponit7771
Jun 28
#72
It is sadly very true. See my below reply to your post about Chinese billionaires.
SunSeeker
Jun 29
#98
Socialism is defined as government ownership of the means of production. That's China.
SunSeeker
Jun 29
#117
Private corps and SEO exist in China it's NO LONGER a socialist country at all.
uponit7771
Jun 28
#71
There are corps that are not directly controlled like SOEs that are majority owned by CCP gov.
uponit7771
Jun 29
#100
Yugoslavia was text book hybrid and even came up with idea of SEZ that China repeated
uponit7771
Jun 28
#69
Bullshit. She does a terrible job of explaining what socialism and communism are, let alone their differences.
SunSeeker
Jun 27
#13
Thank you. This is the best explanation and clarification I've seen on this thread so far.
TheRickles
Jun 27
#29
Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland are all succesful, well regulated capitalist countries.
SunSeeker
Jun 27
#50
Don't forget that Nazis were/are a form of socialist, it's even in the name...
AntiFascist
Jun 27
#25