General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The differences between Socialism & Communism [View all]SunSeeker
(56,173 posts)As is the UK, Ireland, Germany, France and Austria. And so is Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Japan.
Yugoslavia was a socialist country under Tito. If you were not a member of the communist party, you could not hold a decent job. Compared to other countries behind the iron curtain, it had more freedom in the sense that you were allowed to leave the country to work, but it was far from a free country. And it was desperately poor, typical of socialist countries. You being a tourist there is very different from being a citizen there and trying to raise a family. It was a brutal life. That is why my family left Yugoslavia in 1967. Economic failures and rights abuses led to the civil war of 1990 and eventual breakup of Yugoslavia into what are basically small democratic capitalist countries now, but with relatively poor social safety nets, unlike the Scandinavian countries.
Capitalist countries who do not provide basic democratic rights, properly regulate their economy and do not provide an adequate social safety net, like India, are of course not going to be a model to follow. Nobody is saying they should be.
Edit history
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):