Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New York Democrat says Mamdani is 'too extreme' to lead NYC [View all]Celerity
(51,490 posts)26. Rice votes against lower drug costs -- and her party
https://www.liherald.com/stories/rice-votes-against-lower-drug-costs-and-her-party,135168
October 1, 2021
U.S. Rep. Kathleen Rice, of the 4th District, was one of three moderate Democrats who voted against a key provision that would lower prescription drug prices in President Joe Bidens $3.5 trillion infrastructure package, known as the Build Back Better Act, in the House of Energy and Commerce Committee. The others were Rep. Kurt Schrader from Oregon and Rep. Scott Peters from California.
On Sept. 15, the three Democratic votes, in addition to the unanimous disapproval from the Republicans, tied the vote 29-29 in the committee, blocking the plan that would allow Medicare programs to negotiate lower costs for prescription drugs instead of pharmaceutical companies setting their own prices with little competition. This drug pricing provision is based on H.R. 3, the Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act, which passed with zero opposition in 2019. The Congressional Budget Office found that this bill would save the government $456 billion over 10 years and reduce drug prices by 57 percent to 75 percent.
snip
According to Data for Progress, 90 percent of Rices constituents support the provision that she voted against.
snip
Pharmaceutical companies have spent the most of any industry on federal lobbying this year. Combined, they have spent $171 million in 2021, more than twice the amount of the next highest spending industry, and their lobbying expenditures have increased since 2013, topping at $309 million in 2020.
In a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed by Rice and nine other moderate Democrats in May, Peters argued that reduced drug prices would hamper research and development of new medicines in the pharmaceutical industry, echoing the statement that the leading pharmaceutical federal lobbying contributor this year, PhRMA, published in an open letter that was signed by the heads of major pharmaceutical companies.
snip
October 1, 2021
U.S. Rep. Kathleen Rice, of the 4th District, was one of three moderate Democrats who voted against a key provision that would lower prescription drug prices in President Joe Bidens $3.5 trillion infrastructure package, known as the Build Back Better Act, in the House of Energy and Commerce Committee. The others were Rep. Kurt Schrader from Oregon and Rep. Scott Peters from California.
On Sept. 15, the three Democratic votes, in addition to the unanimous disapproval from the Republicans, tied the vote 29-29 in the committee, blocking the plan that would allow Medicare programs to negotiate lower costs for prescription drugs instead of pharmaceutical companies setting their own prices with little competition. This drug pricing provision is based on H.R. 3, the Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act, which passed with zero opposition in 2019. The Congressional Budget Office found that this bill would save the government $456 billion over 10 years and reduce drug prices by 57 percent to 75 percent.
snip
According to Data for Progress, 90 percent of Rices constituents support the provision that she voted against.
snip
Pharmaceutical companies have spent the most of any industry on federal lobbying this year. Combined, they have spent $171 million in 2021, more than twice the amount of the next highest spending industry, and their lobbying expenditures have increased since 2013, topping at $309 million in 2020.
In a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed by Rice and nine other moderate Democrats in May, Peters argued that reduced drug prices would hamper research and development of new medicines in the pharmaceutical industry, echoing the statement that the leading pharmaceutical federal lobbying contributor this year, PhRMA, published in an open letter that was signed by the heads of major pharmaceutical companies.
snip
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Tokens-I found a few while cleaning out drawers! Well other cities have figured it out so it's a worthwhile endeavor.
Nanjeanne
Jun 30
#46
She should stay in her lane which is on the Long Island Expressway not NY city.
Historic NY
Jun 30
#2
I wasn't the biggest Mamdani fan, but all this shit makes me hope he becomes a big voice in the party.
Scrivener7
Jun 30
#5
Yep. And he has good plans. My lukewarm thoughts about him were because NYC is Taco's next
Scrivener7
Jun 30
#50
I cringed every time I heard it. I knew that when our side is busy explaining, then we're losing.
Oopsie Daisy
Jun 30
#23
Because police now respond to many of these issues and the idea is to let the police focus on crime
Nanjeanne
Jun 30
#29
She, like some others, are resurrecting the 1950's red scare and reintroduce the Black List and Loyalty Oaths.
Ping Tung
Jun 30
#15
Doesn't the NYC mayor represent the 5 boroughs --- NOT Long Island or Gillen's district. From my understanding,
Nanjeanne
Jun 30
#39
So what? He's not the mayor of her district and she really should keep out of a race that has nothing to do with
Nanjeanne
Jun 30
#44
We must do more to call out the extremism of thinking it is OK to go bankrupt from medical bills
ck4829
Jul 4
#67