Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: People this is not possible. [View all]Wiz Imp
(6,689 posts)32. Nope yourself. You're wrong.
Get back to me when you can find a single person who will swear to it in court under oath. You won't find one because nobody in that district voted for Harris, exactly like nobody in that district voted for Biden 4 years earlier. It's the truth.
Edited to add: the lawsuit does not even allege that there were sworn affidavits from people claiming to have voted for Harrris. The only sworn affidavits they have relate to votes for Diane Sare, Senate Candidate as referred to below.
Try reading this if you want the full truth about this idiotic lawsuit in Rockland County.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-167466926
A few excerpts:
The only evidence they have in a precinct where Sare only received 5 votes however 8 have sworn affidavits claiming to have voted for Sare leading SMART Elections to determine she would have had a minimum of 9 votes... Not only is the sample size far too small to be considered seriously and affidavits hold little to no water especially when between the 8, only 2 are willing to swear under oath in court and participate as plaintiffs in the lawsuit, including Adam Mocio, a chronic election denier and avid Trump supporter.
Note those 2 people willing to swear under oath would be swearing that they voted for Diane Sare (the Lyndon LaRouche Party candidate) for Senate, not Harris for President. And it would be meaningless since Sare officially received 5 votes.
They also assert in their argument they only interviewed 3% of voters, giving the idea they went door to door when it is truthfully just coalition members and acquaintances. They suggest that because 97% of the population was not interviewed, they suspect they will find more. They filed that in December 2024, they have had half of a year to find more and have not. Furthermore, once this case took social media by storm, one would think people would be coming out of the woodwork.
Despite incredibly misleading information circulating the internet, no expert affidavit by a statistician was provided to the court supporting evidence of election fraud. Lulu Friesdat the co-founder of SMART Legislation, provided an affidavit. She describes herself as an election journalist, and stated that SMART Legislation is an unincorporated action partner of SMART Elections. Friesdat, despite many efforts around the country, has never had a favorable court ruling.
I stand firmly behind organizations with a proven track record of advancing fair, accessible elections groups like the NAACP, the Brennan Center for Justice, the ACLU, and the Campaign Legal Center. These groups understand the real threats: voter suppression, dark money, and policies designed to silence marginalized communities and they have the legal victories to show for it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

garybeck, there are three conclusive explanation replies to your OP...Please come back and respond to them
hlthe2b
Jul 9
#6
Oh, please. Yeah those few hundred votes from a highly conservative Jewish community
hlthe2b
Jul 9
#9
There are citizens who have sworn they voted in a way that makes these posted results false
questionseverything
Jul 9
#10
Local VOTERS have every right to question. But your wanting to make it into a national issue--a Democratic
hlthe2b
Jul 9
#13
Okay. But, I think you know better. This is not like you so it is my disappointment manifesting...
hlthe2b
Jul 9
#24
I'm a hand count, paper ballot advocate and have been since before 2000
questionseverything
Jul 9
#29
GWB was selected by the US Supreme Court. He did not win by 537 votes--the recount was halted.
hlthe2b
Jul 9
#22
Newspapers counted the ballots after gore conceded and found gore would of won a hand count
questionseverything
Jul 9
#33
I'll repeat a post I made a month ago which was simply ignored by the people who are just sure the election was stolen
Wiz Imp
Jul 9
#12
Not this chit again. Biden didn't get any votes either in 2020. We lost, let's focus on midterms and 2028.
Silent Type
Jul 9
#14
There are precincts in my county where I wouldn't be at all shocked if Harris got 0% of the vote.
Pacifist Patriot
Jul 9
#25