General Discussion

MadameButterfly

(3,282 posts)

4. It was time to wake up years ago

Thu Jul 10, 2025, 07:52 AM

Jul 10

But there are multiple ways to address it and nuclear is not the only one. I really don't understand why you are so angry about efforts to promote renewable energy sources other the nuclear.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

txwhitedove Emile icnorth Wounded Bear Cognitive_Resonance

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This is good news for renewable energy [View all] Old Crank Jul 10 OP

G.O.P. will hate on this BoRaGard Jul 10 #1

GOP response, vibrations from turbines killing dolphins. Emile Jul 10 #2

And are making the whales gay! newdeal2 Jul 10 #9

And the Dolphins transsexual airplaneman Jul 10 #16

😱😱 electric_blue68 Jul 11 #21

😱 electric_blue68 Jul 11 #20

I get the riff on the windmills, but it isn't silly to expect that some marine impact studies would be done... hlthe2b Jul 10 #12

However, so called "renewable energy" isn't good news for the planet. NNadir Jul 10 #3

It was time to wake up years ago MadameButterfly Jul 10 #4

I disagree emphatically. Nuclear energy is the only acceptable form of energy. NNadir Jul 10 #6

The opposite is likewise true: the oil/gas industry (esp TX) is increasingly reliant on wind/solar for oil field pumps. hlthe2b Jul 10 #13

Bullshit. They don't stop pumping when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining. NNadir Jul 10 #14

I never said they did. Bullshit right back to you! Tell it to Reuters and others reporting on it. hlthe2b Jul 10 #15

Abuse is what pro-fossil fuel posters do, it's their schtick... Think. Again. Jul 11 #28

Oh, look, it's Mr Atoms. I do reserve the right to change my mind about nuclear power, but not so far. electric_blue68 Jul 11 #23

There are people who care to see, and people who love being blind. I am, of course, know which I have chosen to be. NNadir Jul 11 #25

nuclear is the way forward purple_haze Jul 10 #5

It is definitely ONE OF the clean energy technologies we will need to transition to. Think. Again. Jul 11 #29

Current human population is 8.2 billion. multigraincracker Jul 10 #7

Bingo we have a winner. The Elephant in the room airplaneman Jul 10 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Jul 11 #19

Yep, humanity is overcrowding the planet like an invasive species. Think. Again. Jul 11 #30

If we don't, nature has a way of doing it for us. multigraincracker Jul 11 #40

I agree... Think. Again. Jul 12 #43

Ironically, Nixon was the last president to make a major statement about the population problem. thought crime Jul 11 #33

Didn't President Jimmy Carter Mtnmama Jul 10 #8

They were solar water heating panels. NBachers Jul 10 #11

Yup. 😤 Duppers Jul 10 #18

I was marching for renewables back in the mid 1980's. Effing Ray-gun. electric_blue68 Jul 11 #22

What is the cost ....... dumbcat Jul 10 #10

Don't know. Since this was a pilot project. Old Crank Jul 11 #27

I understand ... dumbcat Jul 11 #35

The cost is CO2-free, is there any other consideration right now? Think. Again. Jul 11 #31

If you actually want things built .... dumbcat Jul 11 #34

I disagree... Think. Again. Jul 11 #36

Yeah, let's save the world by trashing it. hunter Jul 11 #24

How is this trashing it? Old Crank Jul 11 #26

Once upon a time that bit of ocean was a wild place. hunter Jul 11 #37

So nukes leave no environmental footprint.? Old Crank Jul 11 #38

Fission works. It's long "off the ground." The technology is well established... hunter Jul 11 #42

The only other option is to drastically reduce power consumption across the board... Think. Again. Jul 11 #32

That would be good. Old Crank Jul 11 #39

Great news... except to the Windmill Cancer Cluster Kooks. Torchlight Jul 11 #41