Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(168,392 posts)
20. Maddow Blog-Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship blocked by federal judge
Thu Jul 10, 2025, 12:33 PM
Jul 10

The Supreme Court left open a door to challenging the executive order restricting birthright citizenship. The ACLU walked right through.



https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/birthright-citizenship-class-action-trump-executive-order-rcna218023

Trump’s order, however, continues to fare poorly in the courts. NBC News reported:

A federal judge in New Hampshire granted class-action status to a lawsuit seeking to protect babies who would be denied birthright citizenship by the Trump administration and granted a temporary block of the order restricting birthright citizenship from going into effect throughout the country. The suit was brought on behalf of a pregnant immigrant, immigrant parents and their infants and had sought class action status for all babies around the country who would be affected by Trump’s executive order and their parents.


NBC News’ report added that the judge in the case “ordered a preliminary injunction temporarily blocking Trump’s order from going into effect, but stayed his order for seven days, allowing the government time to appeal” — which it almost certainly will.

The ruling in the case was issued by U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Laplante, who was appointed to the federal bench by George W. Bush.

While readers might’ve seen headlines about a related Supreme Court ruling last month, as my MSNBC colleague Jordan Rubin explained, the justices’ highly controversial opinion focused largely on the judiciary’s authority, not on the underlying constitutional issue and the legality of Trump’s order itself.

Within hours of the Supreme Court’s ruling, which left open the possibility of using class action lawsuits to challenge the White House’s policy, the ACLU filed just such a case. On Thursday morning, it scored a key victory. Watch this space.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

i've posted essentially the same question here before... ret5hd Jul 6 #1
I'm not a lawyer, but I've read the Amendment COL Mustard Jul 6 #2
That's not the reason they will be fine. Ms. Toad Jul 6 #5
Thank you, Counselor! COL Mustard Jul 7 #15
Read the executive order. Ms. Toad Jul 6 #3
So tbey create two different levels of citizenship Figarosmom Jul 6 #8
You should be fine if you are white, but if you are a white Dem, you are dead meat. Irish_Dem Jul 6 #10
The birthright citizen executive order has nothing to do with immigration. Ms. Toad Jul 6 #12
Today, I'm afraid, we would COL Mustard Jul 7 #16
I wonder if they would come after my daughters or my granddaughters. DFW Jul 6 #4
That's a different issue. Ms. Toad Jul 6 #7
Trump and the Supreme Court don't give a damn about the laws, statutes, constitution. Irish_Dem Jul 6 #11
They would have to at least pretend to change the law. n/t Ms. Toad Jul 6 #13
Right, the SC goes back to 17th century law to justify their crimes. Irish_Dem Jul 7 #18
One American parent is sufficient under current order LetMyPeopleVote Jul 10 #21
Doesn't matter. Trump will get rid of anyone for any reason. Irish_Dem Jul 6 #6
I think you're right. Figarosmom Jul 6 #9
Correct...... Bread and Circuses Jul 6 #14
If the SCOTUS did go ahead and change the Constitution... thought crime Jul 7 #17
First, it is literally their job to interpret the constitution. Ms. Toad Jul 7 #19
Maddow Blog-Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship blocked by federal judge LetMyPeopleVote Jul 10 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I need an explaination ab...»Reply #20