Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No Josh, you gonna have to run with that mutherfucker. [View all]LuckyLib
(7,008 posts)9. You mean he actually sat down and read the bill?
Sent out some minions to look at likely impact to his constituents? Smacked his forehead with his hand?
Good grief, the stupid is mind-boggling.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Wow that is some bullshit campaign. He is trying to play both sides, ineffectively.
Bev54
Jul 15
#12
No. Trying to do a very narrow rescission bill is not the same as going back ex post facto and saying he wants his Yea
Celerity
Jul 15
#46
No it is not at all. IF Hawley could (he cannot) somehow go back and ex post facto switch from Yea to Nay on the BBB,
Celerity
Jul 16
#52
That is not germane to my narrowly-focused replies. (BTW, I agree with your sentiment, it IS fair to put the blame
Celerity
Jul 16
#55
How about this - Trump and GOP gets there tax cuts, Hawley and maybe a Dem co-sponsor
walkingman
Jul 16
#48
Hawley humiliates the sane Missourians, (Democrats,) every time he opens his mouth or posts.
HeartsCanHope
Jul 16
#63