Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FakeNoose

(37,930 posts)
23. I'll bet they were scrubbed back when Bill Barr had them in his weasel-y hands
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 05:51 PM
Tuesday

Barr had two objectives in mind: remove anything that incriminates Chump (his then-current boss) and also make sure there was nothing about Barr's father in there.

Bill Barr's father may possibly have been the first blackmail victim of Jeffrey Epstein, however there's no way to prove it now. It's just that the circumstance of Mr. Barr (a high school principal) hiring Epstein to teach private school kids - when Epstein was only in his early 20s and had no college degree himself - looks very skeevy in retrospect. Now that we know how Epstein's career turned out.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Translation, they've scrubbed or destroyed the evidence. CentralMass Tuesday #1
Yep newdeal2 Tuesday #3
Weasels the wrong descriptor. He's donald trumps House Elf Volaris Tuesday #16
Scrubbed as clean as 3 minutes of a prison monitor recording. Festivito Tuesday #34
That was my immediate thought too La Coliniere Tuesday #21
It's a trick damifino10 Tuesday #28
Also trying to catch-and-kill the issue. live love laugh Tuesday #30
I just have this sneaking suspicion Docreed2003 Tuesday #2
I'll bet they were scrubbed back when Bill Barr had them in his weasel-y hands FakeNoose Tuesday #23
BEING scrubbed? They've already been scrubbed. live love laugh Tuesday #32
Johnson said, madashelltoo Tuesday #4
Then why didn't you vote for it, Mike? blogslug Tuesday #5
Speaker Johnson ensures the story's cycle continues. Torchlight Tuesday #6
Is I smell a big rat Tribetime Tuesday #7
They were all covered by the Committee vote last night. kentuck Tuesday #19
Send him copies..................... Lovie777 Tuesday #8
He'd better start monitoring the floods heading for Louisiana later this week malaise Tuesday #9
Mike enid602 Tuesday #10
Quid: "I never saw Donald Trump rape anybody." Kid Berwyn Tuesday #11
They got their big bill passed Johonny Tuesday #12
They have their backup pen Vance and their rubber stamp Congress and SCOTUS CentralMass Tuesday #37
"I'm all for the transparency I specifically voted against." nt Gore1FL Tuesday #13
Maybe he has seen some bad poll numbers? Losing MAGA support? Raven123 Tuesday #14
"Mike Johnson Calls For Release of Curated Epstein Files" mahina Tuesday #15
I saw a Vid in Cable news clips that Michael Wolf Cha Tuesday #17
They will release the "files," with nobody on them. Oneironaut Tuesday #18
They got the fake documents ready Nasruddin Tuesday #20
Didn't I just read congress just voted to block the Epstein files? 1WorldHope Tuesday #22
Jeffrey Epstein was a lot of things. Mr. Evil Tuesday #24
I suspe t that she is only still alive because she made contingency plansplsns CentralMass Tuesday #38
Their plan? TSF's plan more like it bluestarone Tuesday #25
Perhaps holy Mike is thinking kkmarie Tuesday #26
But didn't they just tell us there were none? Scrivener7 Tuesday #27
She's made a deal to indict only Democrats nilram Tuesday #29
Hmmmm, sounds suspicious to me!! InAbLuEsTaTe Tuesday #31
This is actually a win! The exposure of Trump while the issue is in the forefront is forcing them to "do SOMETHING". live love laugh Tuesday #33
It's the images and videos that are probably most incriminating... AntiFascist Tuesday #35
I smell a rat BoRaGard Tuesday #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mike Johnson Calls for Re...»Reply #23