General Discussion

SheltieLover

(73,324 posts)

39. Ty for posting!

Reply to highplainsdem (Reply #36)

Sun Aug 10, 2025, 03:02 PM

Aug 10

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wednesdays

95 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Don't applaud fake "creativity" in AI-generated garbage. You're applauding a parody of creativity, and [View all] highplainsdem Aug 10 OP

Absolutely agreed, HPD! SheltieLover Aug 10 #1

Just another tool for creating. 4th Aug 10 #2

There is an enormous difference between being inspired by previous works, and plundering vital parts of them and WhiskeyGrinder Aug 10 #4

No, it isn't. No real learning is required. You can prompt AI to give you an image of or treatise on something highplainsdem Aug 10 #5

Not really. Tommy Carcetti Aug 10 #19

A vital part of art is in the process misanthrope Aug 10 #62

There is no creativity or achievement in AI slop. No heart, no irony, no tenderness, no anger. It is a golem that people WhiskeyGrinder Aug 10 #3

Absolutely agree! FalloutShelter Aug 10 #9

The other thing that gets me is that AI slop is just so fuckin boring. Think of the clips from the new South Park eps WhiskeyGrinder Aug 10 #6

Exactly. highplainsdem Aug 10 #59

Using AI, even as its forced on US through searches, business support ect... is helping to accelerate climate change ImNotGod Aug 10 #7

That's the thing that is under reported. Energy and Resource Consumption progressoid Aug 10 #13

They can't copyright AI 'music' speak easy Aug 10 #8

Spotify is saving a lot of money by filling playlists with AI-generated crap. And that's hurting real highplainsdem Aug 10 #10

Got it :( speak easy Aug 10 #11

The people controlling these corporations will be thrilled if their customers will settle for AI slop. Makes highplainsdem Aug 10 #12

Most modern Pop is just computer generated crap anyway. johnp3907 Aug 10 #40

Written entirely by the artist herself. speak easy Aug 10 #43

This message was self-deleted by its author speak easy Aug 10 #14

Nothing hurts Trump more than exposure of what he's actually done. AI-generated fantasies aren't highplainsdem Aug 10 #16

I'm done with going high. speak easy Aug 10 #20

It isn't going low to say Trump's a pedophile, given the evidence. You just can't say he's a convicted pedophile highplainsdem Aug 10 #25

I was happy to join in taunting Vance about sofas, too. speak easy Aug 10 #26

The problem with that sort of thing, though, is that it will hurt your credibility with those who don't want highplainsdem Aug 10 #32

See reply 21 below, which mentions Curtis Yarvin. Vance's admiration for Yarvin is a much more highplainsdem Aug 10 #38

People want max rewards with min effort. SouthBayDem Aug 10 #15

SOME people do. Some people are not only lazy, but are fine with the fraud that is generative AI. I'd highplainsdem Aug 10 #17

Whenever I see an email that begins with, "I hope this email finds you well..." Tommy Carcetti Aug 10 #18

Very well said! 👏🏼 benfranklin1776 Aug 10 #21

Thanks - including for mentioning Curtis Yarvin. highplainsdem Aug 10 #37

You're welcome. benfranklin1776 Aug 13 #95

Rage against the calculators! JCMach1 Aug 10 #22

Calculators weren't built on the theft of the world's intellectual property, as AI was, and they don't give highplainsdem Aug 10 #29

I agree. It's a tool that, like many tools B.See Aug 10 #47

AI should never be used for facts. Ms. Toad Aug 11 #75

The post to which I referred B.See Aug 11 #79

Not a single one of the hundreds of AI summaries with links that I have reviewed - Ms. Toad Aug 12 #82

Look, again, to be clear, I'm not defending the wholesale and unregulated use of AI. In fact B.See Aug 12 #91

You've lost the thread of the conversation. Ms. Toad Aug 12 #92

No, I'm afraid you've lost the point of my response. B.See Aug 12 #93

You've still lost the thread. Ms. Toad Aug 12 #94

AI is NOT technology MorbidButterflyTat Aug 10 #52

No more than any other derivative art, or research JCMach1 Aug 10 #58

What a stupid imitation of Hemingway. Whatever Artificial Idiot plagiarism machine you used there, it's highplainsdem Aug 10 #63

AI is not inherently theft. Ms. Toad Aug 11 #76

Nowadays more than half of what you see on social media is fake AI generated BS appleannie1 Aug 10 #23

It's really destroying the internet. highplainsdem Aug 10 #30

There's always something destroying the internet. 4th Aug 11 #70

LOL! People defending AI love to make incorrect comparisons. And pop-up blockers can't be compared highplainsdem Aug 11 #71

If it does destroy the internet ... 4th Aug 11 #72

If you want the internet replaced by AI models controlled by tech lords, you're really not thinking. highplainsdem Aug 11 #73

Will not happen 4th Aug 11 #80

AI-slop the worst of all worlds... Hugin Aug 10 #24

Those tools generally have much more influence on users than users realize, whether they're highplainsdem Aug 10 #34

Prompting is almost like a meta programming language JCMach1 Aug 10 #60

You can get different results from identical prompts. Which is why image generators, for highplainsdem Aug 10 #61

In a way, I agree with you on that. Hugin Aug 11 #69

Agents will replace a lot eventually, but in the meantime JCMach1 Aug 11 #74

My grandson, at UCF in Florida, and his classmates cachukis Aug 11 #78

The bottom line on generative AI... Hugin Aug 12 #85

Kicking again SheltieLover Aug 10 #27

Thanks! highplainsdem Aug 10 #36

Ty for posting! SheltieLover Aug 10 #39

NO kidding. I can scarcely stand to go on Youtube anymore due to the clickbait AI-generated content... hlthe2b Aug 10 #28

I agree. I've been shocked by how fast AI slop has flooded YouTube. highplainsdem Aug 10 #33

AI? Straw Man Aug 10 #31

Generative AI is the most harmful non-weapon tech ever developed. highplainsdem Aug 10 #35

Here's how my last interaction with ChatGPT went, and I don't feel too awful about it AZJonnie Aug 10 #41

" all I'm doing is costing the company money." And massively increasing your carbon footprint for no gain. WhiskeyGrinder Aug 10 #44

I doubt that I 'massively increased my carbon footprint' as a human by doing this AZJonnie Aug 10 #45

. WhiskeyGrinder Aug 10 #46

Yes, that is what I'm saying AZJonnie Aug 10 #51

. WhiskeyGrinder Aug 10 #54

Okay, but as far as the effect on the earth's climate is concerned, it doesn't matter one whit AZJonnie Aug 10 #56

Mind-boggling. highplainsdem Aug 10 #49

You think I have an aversion to conversations with real people, on their own schedules? AZJonnie Aug 10 #55

Sigh. highplainsdem Aug 10 #57

It's disheartening to see anyone here praise and promote a chatbot. I just skimmed that because I highplainsdem Aug 10 #48

This exchange MorbidButterflyTat Aug 10 #53

That's the 1st thing I noticed about Llama jfz9580m Aug 12 #84

I agree Takket Aug 10 #42

That future is already terrifying artists, and I've met some who sound almost suicidal. They know highplainsdem Aug 10 #50

Couldn't agree more jfz9580m Aug 10 #64

I love Ed Zitron, whom you just recommended. Have posted a number of threads about him here. highplainsdem Aug 11 #66

Well jfz9580m Aug 11 #68

"What works for our side is reality. Showing people the reality of what Trump is, and what he's doing"....... Jack Valentino Aug 10 #65

You're not going to reach the people you want to convince with AI slop. highplainsdem Aug 11 #67

I won't regret using A.I. if it helps me make enough money to keep me alive, Jack Valentino Aug 12 #81

I've said on DU that I sympathize with people forced to use AI for work or school...though I hope they highplainsdem Aug 12 #86

electronic kudzu.... choke out everything IA8IT Aug 11 #77

Good metonym. highplainsdem Aug 12 #87

New Word! Thank You IA8IT Aug 12 #89

speaking as a creative -- i fucking hate AI nt orleans Aug 12 #83

Creatives should hate it. There's no greater threat to creative work. highplainsdem Aug 12 #88

i completely agree! nt orleans Aug 12 #90