General Discussion

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,949 posts)

18. I didn't give you an answer, so you are barking up the wrong tree.

Sun Aug 10, 2025, 03:52 PM

Aug 10

You can go bother the person who gave you the answer you seem to dislike, the same answer several have given you, ... the only answer people have given in the thread, ... but you have never responded positively to that answer and you have not thanked any of them.

I simply quoted the answer you had already been given, ... a good and true answer, but an answer you ignored disingenuously and argumentatively.

If much earlier, like in your first reply to your first response, ... if you had simply said "I didn't intend to suggest a conspiracy theory", you would be less upset by the way people have been reacting. You would have nipped it in the bud. Instead you accused one of having "an overly large burr under your saddle".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

re JD Vance: I am asking, as a matter of curiosity, if he actually won his . . . . [View all] Stinky The Clown Aug 10 OP

I am asking as a matter of curiosity... Fiendish Thingy Aug 10 #1

You do realize the OP was a question, right? Stinky The Clown Aug 10 #2

And you got an answer that you seem not to like Bernardo de La Paz Aug 10 #3

Did you intentionally miss the reply's opening? Stinky The Clown Aug 10 #6

No. I did not intentionally miss the reply's opening. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 10 #14

What raised the curiosity that inspired you to ask the question? Fiendish Thingy Aug 10 #4

Wow, this must have put an overly large burr under your saddle. Stinky The Clown Aug 10 #7

Not particularly Fiendish Thingy Aug 10 #12

You expect answers to your question but totally dodge giving an answer to a question asked of you. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 10 #16

Your OP answer was disingenuous and intended to argue, not answer Stinky The Clown Aug 10 #17

I didn't give you an answer, so you are barking up the wrong tree. Bernardo de La Paz Aug 10 #18

Why is any of this - apart from the OP - of concern to you? Stinky The Clown Aug 10 #20

You seem to think there is "an answer" to what you said in your OP. muriel_volestrangler Aug 10 #19

It wasn't a serious question based on any evidence EdmondDantes_ Aug 10 #13

I can only imagine if DU was around in 1984 Polybius Aug 10 #11

I have no doubt he won. yardwork Aug 10 #5

Thanks Stinky The Clown Aug 10 #8

"...if he actually won his . . . Senate seat in Ohio. " LudwigPastorius Aug 10 #9

He really won Polybius Aug 10 #10

What raised your suspicions that he might not have won? Bernardo de La Paz Aug 10 #15

It's Ohio JI7 Aug 10 #21