Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SimpleMan

(263 posts)

2. That's exactly what I was thinking.

Reply to Silent Type (Reply #1)

Wed Sep 17, 2025, 01:22 PM

Sep 17

No law, no matter how well worded will stop everyone. But we have to start somewhere.

I really believe that if politician started promoting that idea, they would get a lot of attention from both sides.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Silent Type

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just a thought about how to reign in "Artificial Intelligence" [View all] SimpleMan Sep 17 OP

+1. Marking them prominently sure seems a simple solution to the biggest problem. It won't stop some rogue Silent Type Sep 17 #1

That's exactly what I was thinking. SimpleMan Sep 17 #2

US should require a Sovereign Fund, similar to what Norway did with oil jmbar2 Sep 17 #3

If you'd been following AI news, you'd know that this has been among many suggestions for years for reining in highplainsdem Sep 17 #4

I knew there was probably a reason. SimpleMan Sep 17 #5