Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(58,900 posts)
4. If you'd been following AI news, you'd know that this has been among many suggestions for years for reining in
Wed Sep 17, 2025, 01:40 PM
Sep 17

AI.

The main problem is that the AI bros are opposed to regulation and have the money to buy political power. You saw them line up to support Trump and oppose regulation.

Another problem is that there are currently no reliable tech means to mark what's AI-generated as such. Especially text.

A third problem is that AI companies that have considered trying to create a way of marking AI slop (it's all slop) have been told by the majority of their users - their customers - that the users do NOT want what's AI-generated marked as such.

And a fourth - and possibly most important - problem is that ANYONE considering generative AI's theft of the world's intellectual property, and use for all types of fraud, as AT ALL ACCEPTABLE is giving a thumbs-up to that theft and fraud. As well as a thumbs-up to the environmental damage, the dumbing down of users, and the other harms resulting from the most harmful non-weapon tech ever.

Marking some of the AI slop, in what would be a constant war against those finding ways to remove the markings, would be only a partial temporary solution to a fundamentally unethical and harmful tech.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just a thought about how ...»Reply #4