Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

JustAnotherGen

(37,328 posts)

3. All in on soft secession

Reply to erronis (Reply #2)

Thu Sep 18, 2025, 02:39 PM

Sep 18

Printz v United States and Murphy v NCAA.

I was speaking with someone yesterday in NJ State AG's office (friends but they work in there) and those two cases mean 'something'.

IE- Fed Orders but can't the fed just pull all of that info themselves? I don't believe they compel our State Govs to do work that is not timely, reasonable, and doesn't interfere with their regular work product.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

erronis

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The 2026 election is already under attack -- Judd Legum and Rebecca Crosby - Popular Information [View all] erronis Sep 18 OP

DOJ Sues Maine and Oregon JustAnotherGen Sep 18 #1

I think at that point any data that doesn't agree with the SCOTUS-6's opinion would be discarded. erronis Sep 18 #2

All in on soft secession JustAnotherGen Sep 18 #3

Someone asked me yesterday about "soft secession". My first reaction is it can't happen, erronis Sep 18 #4

This was the very first step JustAnotherGen Sep 18 #5