Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Ellipsis

(9,395 posts)
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 01:25 PM Friday

Andrew Kerr- Architect - Here's why the new White House ballroom project is not real. [View all]

Take it for what it's worth. This is floating around on social media.

From the architect.

Here's why the new White House ballroom project is not real. (The demo is obviously real.) Some background - I am a licensed Architect with 20+ years of experience. I have worked on multiple Federal projects with sensitive building programs that required background checks.

1. With a projected size of 90,000sf and a newly revised budget of $300M, the cost per square foot would be $3,333. No building costs anywhere near that. $1,000/sf is astronomical.

2. Let's assume, since we are drawing in the classical, style, that the proportions of the building adhere to the Golden Ratio. A 90,000sf would be a building with a footprint roughly 380' x 235'. Longer than a football field and 1.5x as wide.

2. The building is projected to accommodate 999 people. 15sf/person is required for a banquet area; 20sf/person is pretty comfortable. What you see in the rendering below is closer to 20sf/person. That's only 20,000sf, or a space that is 200'x100'. It's supposed to be a ballroom, so let's be extraordinarily generous and provide 10,000sf for the ballroom support functions, and another 10,000sf for pre-function. Extraordinarily generous. That's STILL only 40,000sf, not even half of the supposed building.

3. There are no drawings for the building. The renderings are poorly coordinated - exterior views do not match the interior views. See below - the White House is 70 feet tall, to the roof. The interior renderings show a room that is roughly 100' x 200', with a ~20 foot ceiling. The exterior renderings show a building footprint of 4.5x that amount.
Those are renderings that could be produced by young staff in a week or two, at most. Nothing else exists.

Sorry for the Facebook link
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10239930099731751&set

73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Great info, great post. Permanut Friday #1
So what is the hypothesis? intrepidity Friday #2
Maybe a new grift? Raven123 Friday #23
a huge grift. the oompa loompa isn't sartisfied w/ the money he's already made selling his coins + nft's. pansypoo53219 Friday #40
3 levels IbogaProject Friday #55
The destruction of the East Wing is real. sop Friday #3
This Layzeebeaver 13 hrs ago #73
They are playing a $300.million project by ear. Klarkashton Friday #4
Embezzlement Diraven Friday #27
Well, Not Exactly "By Ear," More Like by the Seat of His Soiled Diaper The Roux Comes First Friday #32
Once the east wing was destroyed... ananda Friday #45
"What is this, a center for ants?" leftstreet Friday #5
Great movie orangecrush Friday #37
I would bet that there are numerous below-grade levels planned. maxsolomon Friday #6
"No markodochartaigh Friday #7
Here we go!!! NJCher Friday #8
How nice of you to claim Andrew Kerr is not real. Bernardo de La Paz Friday #30
I don't think NJCher is saying Mr Kerr AllyCat Friday #46
She says when the "REAL architects" speak up, as if Kerr is not real Bernardo de La Paz Friday #51
Yes and no FBaggins Friday #61
You make some good points and lay them out well. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Friday #64
still trying to figure out how to grift most of it back into his own pocket eShirl Friday #9
Trump hired the contractor popsdenver Friday #50
Seems like typical Facebook nonsense FBaggins Friday #10
NYT article gifted for you Ellipsis Friday #16
The WH has supplied a couple of renderings ("drawing" in your language). No idea what illustration FB has. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Friday #28
"Drawings" was Kerr's label. I just adopted it in my response on that point. FBaggins Friday #62
You're the one spouting nonsense. Wiz Imp Friday #53
Its been brought up elsewhere that tRumps ballroom exactlly mirrors putins ballroom in russia though its 5% bigger so yaesu Friday #11
Yeah... that was mostly nonsense FBaggins Friday #21
Don't bring facts and truth into a good meme lol... WarGamer Friday #39
Post removed Post removed Friday #57
The reason the price keeps going up daily Gaugamela Friday #12
It will be built as cheaply as possible. Trump will pocket the extra money from the oligarchs' donations (bribes) Ocelot II Friday #19
Exactly. Gaugamela Friday #20
Yes the billionaires are standing in line waiting to throw money at it FakeNoose Friday #24
I had wondered about that cost per square foot dsc Friday #13
Chirst, now trump even has architects questioning whether building was destroyed and is being rebuilt to trump's specs. Silent Type Friday #14
Very good chance the open wound will fester for months or years. Bernardo de La Paz Friday #25
Most likely redoing the bunker under it to be more up to date nt EX500rider Friday #15
Good idea Diraven Friday #29
That's what I think; they're going deep. thought crime Friday #38
Even a bunker won't survive a Ground Zero strike from a Russian nuclear ground burst EX500rider Friday #44
And there is also a water table issue to an extent obamanut2012 Friday #59
That's true Diraven 23 hrs ago #69
So said Thom Hartmann vapor2 Friday #60
So it's a concept of a plan? Ocelot II Friday #17
Just like health care. Ellipsis Friday #18
So "sick f*ck" is now a legitimate measurement? BaronChocula Friday #22
At a minimum, 50-60% of the cost is going into Trump's pocket. Scalded Nun Friday #26
Building a throne room then? cstanleytech Friday #31
Historian Doug Brinkley this a.m. on Morning Joe, got heated up about this allegorical oracle Friday #33
Bottom line: NCDem47 Friday #34
He left out a critical part... WarGamer Friday #35
Wrong about what exactly? obamanut2012 Friday #52
about cost estimates... WarGamer Friday #65
All Chump wants to do is look at the carpet samples FakeNoose Friday #66
Very interesting.... viva la Friday #36
I clicked on the FB link and got a page that said, "Sorry, this content isn't available right now." ShazzieB Friday #41
He might have changed privileges Ellipsis Friday #42
That's okay. ShazzieB Yesterday #67
Posted to another DU thread earlier today: evolves Friday #43
Also gives whomever wants to target WH a great view of the rebuild... blue_jay Friday #47
Fake ballroom... dlk Friday #48
Because it is a scam misanthrope Friday #49
The Epstein Ball Room Emile Friday #54
Add it to the list of impeachable offenses Bluestocking Friday #56
The Epstein Ballroom and Casino will never be completed. I doubt if the construction phase will actually begin. Ford_Prefect Friday #58
Facebook link sez "content not available"..... n/t Dixiegrrrl Friday #63
Don't forget the bunker. scipan Yesterday #68
By the numbers - 90,000 sq. ft. is 2.07 acres. flashman13 14 hrs ago #70
For a single-story building FBaggins 13 hrs ago #72
The Epstein Ballroom only exists in Trump's mind SARose 14 hrs ago #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Andrew Kerr- Architect - ...