Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,521 posts)
61. Yes and no
Fri Oct 24, 2025, 07:46 PM
Friday

I'll often see an attorney's opinion cited in a debate here on some constitutional issue only to find that they specialize in family law or real estate law. Those are perfectly respectable professions, but the writer may have only taken a single semester of con law two or three decades ago. I often find that student I coach for moot court have a superior understanding of the issues involved than the person being cited as authoritative... despite lacking a law degree (or even an undergraduate degree at that point).

Kerr is the COO of an architecture firm that appears only to do home construction and home improvement projects. His graduate degrees are in business and operations management. That's entirely appropriate for his position, but the people in the firm actively doing architechture work have their advanced degrees in architecture... and even then I would take with a grain of salt their opinions on federal building cost estimates.

The more recent illustrations posted here are from McCrery Architects. McCrery is a professor of architecture at CU in DC who specializes in classic architecture and has worked on the US Capitol, the Capitol here in NC, and the Supreme Court.

Kerr is drawing conclusions on far too little data. He's already taken down the original images when he realized that they were discredited. He "stands by" his analysis... but it's demonstrably outside of his area of expertise.

As a simple example - consider his statement "the cost per square foot would be $3,333. No building costs anywhere near that. $1,000/sf is astronomical." Then consider the recent debate over renovations for the Federal Reserve HQ building that are currently underway. Trump was lambasting Powell over how wasteful the spending was and most of us here took the opposite position. Well... that's a $2.5 Billion dollar project... which renovates 402k sqft and expands an additional 440k sqft. That's $3k/sqft and half of it is renovation... not demolition and new construction.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great info, great post. Permanut Friday #1
So what is the hypothesis? intrepidity Friday #2
Maybe a new grift? Raven123 Friday #23
a huge grift. the oompa loompa isn't sartisfied w/ the money he's already made selling his coins + nft's. pansypoo53219 Friday #40
3 levels IbogaProject Friday #55
The destruction of the East Wing is real. sop Friday #3
This Layzeebeaver Saturday #73
They are playing a $300.million project by ear. Klarkashton Friday #4
Embezzlement Diraven Friday #27
Well, Not Exactly "By Ear," More Like by the Seat of His Soiled Diaper The Roux Comes First Friday #32
Once the east wing was destroyed... ananda Friday #45
"What is this, a center for ants?" leftstreet Friday #5
Great movie orangecrush Friday #37
I would bet that there are numerous below-grade levels planned. maxsolomon Friday #6
"No markodochartaigh Friday #7
Here we go!!! NJCher Friday #8
How nice of you to claim Andrew Kerr is not real. Bernardo de La Paz Friday #30
I don't think NJCher is saying Mr Kerr AllyCat Friday #46
She says when the "REAL architects" speak up, as if Kerr is not real Bernardo de La Paz Friday #51
Yes and no FBaggins Friday #61
You make some good points and lay them out well. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Friday #64
still trying to figure out how to grift most of it back into his own pocket eShirl Friday #9
Trump hired the contractor popsdenver Friday #50
Seems like typical Facebook nonsense FBaggins Friday #10
NYT article gifted for you Ellipsis Friday #16
The WH has supplied a couple of renderings ("drawing" in your language). No idea what illustration FB has. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Friday #28
"Drawings" was Kerr's label. I just adopted it in my response on that point. FBaggins Friday #62
You're the one spouting nonsense. Wiz Imp Friday #53
Its been brought up elsewhere that tRumps ballroom exactlly mirrors putins ballroom in russia though its 5% bigger so yaesu Friday #11
Yeah... that was mostly nonsense FBaggins Friday #21
Don't bring facts and truth into a good meme lol... WarGamer Friday #39
Post removed Post removed Friday #57
The reason the price keeps going up daily Gaugamela Friday #12
It will be built as cheaply as possible. Trump will pocket the extra money from the oligarchs' donations (bribes) Ocelot II Friday #19
Exactly. Gaugamela Friday #20
Yes the billionaires are standing in line waiting to throw money at it FakeNoose Friday #24
I had wondered about that cost per square foot dsc Friday #13
Chirst, now trump even has architects questioning whether building was destroyed and is being rebuilt to trump's specs. Silent Type Friday #14
Very good chance the open wound will fester for months or years. Bernardo de La Paz Friday #25
Most likely redoing the bunker under it to be more up to date nt EX500rider Friday #15
Good idea Diraven Friday #29
That's what I think; they're going deep. thought crime Friday #38
Even a bunker won't survive a Ground Zero strike from a Russian nuclear ground burst EX500rider Friday #44
And there is also a water table issue to an extent obamanut2012 Friday #59
That's true Diraven Saturday #69
So said Thom Hartmann vapor2 Friday #60
So it's a concept of a plan? Ocelot II Friday #17
Just like health care. Ellipsis Friday #18
So "sick f*ck" is now a legitimate measurement? BaronChocula Friday #22
At a minimum, 50-60% of the cost is going into Trump's pocket. Scalded Nun Friday #26
Building a throne room then? cstanleytech Friday #31
Historian Doug Brinkley this a.m. on Morning Joe, got heated up about this allegorical oracle Friday #33
Bottom line: NCDem47 Friday #34
He left out a critical part... WarGamer Friday #35
Wrong about what exactly? obamanut2012 Friday #52
about cost estimates... WarGamer Friday #65
All Chump wants to do is look at the carpet samples FakeNoose Friday #66
Very interesting.... viva la Friday #36
I clicked on the FB link and got a page that said, "Sorry, this content isn't available right now." ShazzieB Friday #41
He might have changed privileges Ellipsis Friday #42
That's okay. ShazzieB Saturday #67
Posted to another DU thread earlier today: evolves Friday #43
Also gives whomever wants to target WH a great view of the rebuild... blue_jay Friday #47
Fake ballroom... dlk Friday #48
Because it is a scam misanthrope Friday #49
The Epstein Ball Room Emile Friday #54
Add it to the list of impeachable offenses Bluestocking Friday #56
The Epstein Ballroom and Casino will never be completed. I doubt if the construction phase will actually begin. Ford_Prefect Friday #58
Facebook link sez "content not available"..... n/t Dixiegrrrl Friday #63
Don't forget the bunker. scipan Saturday #68
By the numbers - 90,000 sq. ft. is 2.07 acres. flashman13 Saturday #70
For a single-story building FBaggins Saturday #72
The Epstein Ballroom only exists in Trump's mind SARose Saturday #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Andrew Kerr- Architect - ...»Reply #61