Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(8,356 posts)
3. I wouldn't trust Mark Epstein at all.
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 09:55 PM
Nov 18

But even if true, I'm confident it will not work.

There are plenty of people who have seen the files. Who knows how many people were working on the investigation under the Biden DOJ which Trump/Bondi stopped immediately upon taking office but I'm sure there were a lot of people working on it. The Biden DOJ was deciding who to charge and with what crimes. I'm sure there will be whistleblowers revealing the truth if necessary. Oh, and the bill itself details the only information that can be legitimately withheld or redacted. The only info that can be legally redacted is names and personal info of the victims. The names of any persons who had contact with Epstein that are mentioned in the files should be released. Embarrassment is not a valid reason for redaction.

(1) The Attorney general may withhold or redact the segregable portions of records that—

(A) contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;

(B) depict or contain child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) as defined under 18 U.S.C. 2256 and prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 2252–2252A;


(C) would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, provided that such withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary;

(D) depict or contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury of any person; or

(E) contain information specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order.

(2) All redactions must be accompanied by a written justification published in the Federal Register and submitted to Congress.

(3) To the extent that any covered information would otherwise be redacted or withheld as classified information under this section, the Attorney General shall declassify that classified information to the maximum extent possible.

(A) If the Attorney General makes a determination that covered information may not be declassified and made available in a manner that protects the national security of the United States, including methods or sources related to national security, the Attorney General shall release an unclassified summary for each of the redacted or withheld classified information.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Gotta be unredacted copies somewhere....please baby Jesus, please.... wcmagumba Nov 18 #1
Shocking. Shocking, I tell you. Liberal In Texas Nov 18 #2
I wouldn't trust Mark Epstein at all. Wiz Imp Nov 18 #3
I have to hope that on Nov. 6, 2024 misanthrope Nov 19 #13
yeah........ Takket Nov 18 #4
Highly probable. B.See Nov 19 #20
The point is to obfuscate. Oneironaut Nov 18 #5
I don't want this to happen, progressoid Nov 18 #10
Why would a "Democrat hoax" only contain names of Democrats? misanthrope Nov 19 #14
Because they constantly contradict themselves, and, society has the memory of a goldfish. Oneironaut Nov 19 #18
Leaked copy of the complete vault of Epstein Files with Republicans removed. usonian Nov 18 #6
I seriously doubt that we will ever know who these scumbags are because they can destroy walkingman Nov 18 #7
It has been for a long time misanthrope Nov 19 #15
It is already a fact that Trump's name has been scrubbed from subpoenaed files. gab13by13 Nov 18 #8
After tonight because of the Senate vote JPK Nov 18 #9
My first thought after Dump told them to vote for release. roamer65 Nov 19 #11
Maybe that's why the donald finally went along with it? calimary Nov 19 #12
Or he has no choice planj07 Nov 19 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author planj07 Nov 19 #16
I think it will blow up in there face if they do that Buckeyeblue Nov 19 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Epstein's Brother Claims ...»Reply #3