Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usonian

(22,675 posts)
2. "Social" sites stopped being social when they introduced news feeds to further addict users.
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 10:54 PM
Tuesday

Ads were bad enough.

I avoid them all. I heavily filter DU for noisiness (I avoid a lot of heavily trafficked forums, just for the time involved) and I use Hacker News, which I skim. Not social at all. It's techie-oriented.

The only remaining and the original social network is email. (once you cut out the spam)

Being social, to me, exists within trusted contexts. We can't maintain any kind of relationship with more than 150 people, Dunbar's Number. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number

That, quite simply, is too few to exploit.

But it should be the basis of any *real* social networking.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The State of the Open Soc...»Reply #2