Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Washington Post editorial board comes out against releasing the Epstein files [View all]Deep State Witch
(12,478 posts)16. Bezos Is In The Files
That's why Mackenzie Scott divorced him. I'll betcha dollars to donuts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
14 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Washington Post editorial board comes out against releasing the Epstein files [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Sunday
OP
From the editorial: Now that the law has passed so overwhelmingly, it is essential for the government to promptly comply
Celerity
Sunday
#51
I have $5 that says Bezo is on the list of "inner circle" of Epstien...any takers?
NotHardly
Sunday
#34
Yep. That was my first thought. Also, who else among the so-called elite are in the documents?
Texin
Sunday
#46
This makes me suspicious. There is something there the Post does not want revealed.
CTyankee
Sunday
#4
"A public man has no right to let his actions be determined by particular interests.
Ping Tung
Sunday
#11
Is the WP just left open as a loss leader for Bezos to pump out propaganda and misinformation at this pont?
NCDem47
Sunday
#13
Sniffs of Bezos calling the shots. Especially like the bit wherein "the Justice
allegorical oracle
Sunday
#15
The ONLY reason I can think for for WAPO to be this irresponsible is that someone on their board...
Trueblue Texan
Sunday
#23
Jeff Bezos is making a strategic strike to pay for his billion dollars in government favorable decisions.
Baitball Blogger
Sunday
#25
I cancelled my digital subscription to the WaPo earlier this year. Here's hoping Jeff Bezos
generalbetrayus
Sunday
#30
I cannot verify this claim. Does anyone have a valid link?Yahoo had brief references.
33taw
Sunday
#32
Yes, it's just a long way of saying "we have to protect powerful men who use young girls for sex
Walleye
Sunday
#55
You should delete or at least update this post. Here is the opening of the editorial:
RandomNumbers
Sunday
#40
So they're saying the crimes of paying to rape children have "no public interest". I tripple dog dare them to go
Hotler
Sunday
#44
Praising Clay Higgins? Please let me modify and mis-quote two oft mis-quoted phrases:
Bo Zarts
Sunday
#47
We normally agree, but I think his post IS misleading due to this quote from the editorial:
Celerity
Sunday
#69
I see your point, but I took it as the Post opposing their release in principle
Ocelot II
Sunday
#71
Not exactly true or accurate, but that's never stopped anyone from posting. Here's some actual quotes from editorial.
Silent Type
Sunday
#56
The basic idea that it isn't in the public interest to release DOJ materials in this case
RockRaven
Sunday
#59
Shameful use of once was a great paper to spread misinformation and protect the people in an international
Botany
Yesterday
#80
The OP is misleading due to its using a clickbait X-tweet that false frames:
Celerity
22 hrs ago
#85