General Discussion

Ocelot II

(128,412 posts)

26. Could Bezos possibly fellate Trump any more enthusiastically?

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Sun Nov 23, 2025, 11:46 AM

Sunday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

SupportSanity oberle

87 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Washington Post editorial board comes out against releasing the Epstein files [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Sunday OP

Pedocracy thrives in darkness BeyondGeography Sunday #1

Pedocracy thrives in Darkness Dwild Sunday #43

From the editorial: Now that the law has passed so overwhelmingly, it is essential for the government to promptly comply Celerity Sunday #51

Sounds both-sidesish MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #62

Half of them are probably on it. Blumancru Sunday #2

Wanna bet someone in Bezos' inner circle is in there JT45242 Sunday #3

I have $5 that says Bezo is on the list of "inner circle" of Epstien...any takers? NotHardly Sunday #34

Maybe that's why Mackenzie Scott dumped him Jilly_in_VA Yesterday #83

He doesn't need to be on the list, look at what he wants from Trump. Bezos Bev54 Sunday #39

This. The window is closing. JB is getting what he can, while he can. Maru Kitteh Sunday #41

Yep. That was my first thought. Also, who else among the so-called elite are in the documents? Texin Sunday #46

This makes me suspicious. There is something there the Post does not want revealed. CTyankee Sunday #4

Let me fix your title edhopper Sunday #5

Right after Donvict threatened him. KS Toronado Sunday #37

Jeff Bezos just TOTALLY added his name to the pedo perps! BComplex Sunday #50

Fuck that rag Aviation Pro Sunday #6

This FalloutShelter Sunday #7

I regret I only had one cancellation to give for my MaeScott Sunday #31

Imagine that. 2naSalit Sunday #8

The WP doesn't exist except as a name. nt BootinUp Sunday #9

The $$$ says no, and the Board Bows Tesha Sunday #10

"A public man has no right to let his actions be determined by particular interests. Ping Tung Sunday #11

Here is WaPo's argument Sympthsical Sunday #12

Problem WmChris Sunday #19

Agree Sympthsical Sunday #27

This message was self-deleted by its author yonder Sunday #61

It's not as if Bezos and his editorial board are unaware... returnee Sunday #66

Is the WP just left open as a loss leader for Bezos to pump out propaganda and misinformation at this pont? NCDem47 Sunday #13

Not exactly onenote Sunday #14

Don't tell me, let me guess... YodaMom2 Sunday #36

Sniffs of Bezos calling the shots. Especially like the bit wherein "the Justice allegorical oracle Sunday #15

Yes, in Trump World PatSeg Sunday #33

It's "just us" to the oligarchs. n/t intheflow Yesterday #81

Ah yes, very clever! PatSeg Yesterday #82

Bezos Is In The Files Deep State Witch Sunday #16

The only conclusion is Bezos is a pedo alongside with Epstein Arazi Sunday #17

Have they issued a glowing endorsement of RWNJ Clay Higgins yet? Zambero Sunday #18

So WaPo is pro-pedo? That'll cost them. Vinca Sunday #20

Probably because bozos and the rest of the board are in the files. Clouds Passing Sunday #21

Hmm...seems Jeff Bezos is mentioned in those files. paleotn Sunday #22

The ONLY reason I can think for for WAPO to be this irresponsible is that someone on their board... Trueblue Texan Sunday #23

F the Post LilElf70 Sunday #24

Jeff Bezos is making a strategic strike to pay for his billion dollars in government favorable decisions. Baitball Blogger Sunday #25

Could Bezos possibly fellate Trump any more enthusiastically? Ocelot II Sunday #26

I do not have a subscription to the Washington Post. mahatmakanejeeves Sunday #28

Two things: Must be bad. R I.P. WAPO. Joinfortmill Sunday #29

I cancelled my digital subscription to the WaPo earlier this year. Here's hoping Jeff Bezos generalbetrayus Sunday #30

I cannot verify this claim. Does anyone have a valid link?Yahoo had brief references. 33taw Sunday #32

I don't think it's much of a mystery. Martin Eden Sunday #35

Yes, it's just a long way of saying "we have to protect powerful men who use young girls for sex Walleye Sunday #55

This message was self-deleted by its author Uncle Joe Sunday #38

You should delete or at least update this post. Here is the opening of the editorial: RandomNumbers Sunday #40

🤔 Wondering if Jeff Bezos is on the Epstein List 🤔 n/t aggiesal Sunday #42

So they're saying the crimes of paying to rape children have "no public interest". I tripple dog dare them to go Hotler Sunday #44

I was a delivery boy for the Washington Post for seven years in the 1950s. ... dedl67 Sunday #45

Praising Clay Higgins? Please let me modify and mis-quote two oft mis-quoted phrases: Bo Zarts Sunday #47

Archive link dpibel Sunday #48

That is not an archive link. Here is an actual archive link: Celerity Yesterday #84

My bad dpibel Yesterday #86

All good! Celerity Yesterday #87

Fuck you Jeff Bezos! Initech Sunday #49

They moved from All the President's Men to this shit. . . Stargleamer Sunday #52

This begs the question, whose name(s) might be released with the files? dlk Sunday #53

Archive link, no paywall: Ocelot II Sunday #54

We normally agree, but I think his post IS misleading due to this quote from the editorial: Celerity Sunday #69

I see your point, but I took it as the Post opposing their release in principle Ocelot II Sunday #71

Not exactly true or accurate, but that's never stopped anyone from posting. Here's some actual quotes from editorial. Silent Type Sunday #56

"Political clamoring" is the same thing as public interest Walleye Sunday #57

In other words, Bezos is in the files... regnaD kciN Sunday #58

The basic idea that it isn't in the public interest to release DOJ materials in this case RockRaven Sunday #59

Bezos Toilet Paper Mysterian Sunday #60

Morons run the WA Post. I wanna know and I am ......The Public !!!!!!! Trueblue1968 Sunday #63

So glad I dumped my subscription. phylny Sunday #64

Hunh... LudwigPastorius Sunday #65

I would agree during normal times Buckeyeblue Sunday #67

wapo used to be a fine newspaper mike_c Sunday #68

What a surprise. Bezos the Pedo Protector. Cha Sunday #70

Right after the meeting with MBS relayerbob Sunday #72

The Washington POSt needs a massive boycott Blue Owl Sunday #73

lol they must be really, really, really bad SamuelTheThird Sunday #74

If this stuff ever gets out its going to be spectacular Ruby the Liberal Yesterday #75

Bezos on a leash. spanone Yesterday #76

State run media Patton French Yesterday #77

JFC orangecrush Yesterday #78

Shameful decision by a once-respectable paper. (nt) Paladin Yesterday #79

Shameful use of once was a great paper to spread misinformation and protect the people in an international Botany Yesterday #80

The OP is misleading due to its using a clickbait X-tweet that false frames: Celerity Yesterday #85