General Discussion

mr715

(2,442 posts)

8. Very improper semantics

Reply to demmiblue (Original post)

Tue Nov 25, 2025, 08:40 AM

Tuesday

"Fight club"
"Mutinous"

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

vanessa_ca

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Chuck Schumer Faces Pushback From a 'Fight Club' of Senate Democrats [View all] demmiblue Tuesday OP

. dalton99a Tuesday #1

This is great. I love Chris Murphy more and more these days. I hope he and the others succeed Scrivener7 Tuesday #2

Nice way to put it, gab13by13 Tuesday #4

Good in two ways Jilly_in_VA Tuesday #3

I have ALWAYS voted for him. I'll vote for a primary challenger next time Scrivener7 Tuesday #5

He will back out if AOC challenges him. gab13by13 Tuesday #6

I don't think so. I don't think he believes that. I do, but I don't think he does. Scrivener7 Tuesday #7

He'll be 78 in two years SocialDemocrat61 Tuesday #9

How do you feel about Bernie Sanders? murielm99 Tuesday #15

I don't recall Sanders say that Biden was too old and should step down SocialDemocrat61 Tuesday #16

I asked how YOU felt about Bernie. murielm99 Tuesday #17

Age is a number SocialDemocrat61 Tuesday #19

Okay. murielm99 Tuesday #20

Why SMDH? SocialDemocrat61 Tuesday #21

Your post number 9 does not criticize Schumer over his age? murielm99 Tuesday #24

No SocialDemocrat61 Tuesday #25

Both Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are older than Chuck Schumer. lapucelle Tuesday #36

Irrelevant SocialDemocrat61 Tuesday #40

Where did you read that Schumer wanted Biden to drop out because of his age? Do you have a source? lapucelle Tuesday #43

Ok SocialDemocrat61 Tuesday #44

That's not a source for your claim. Your claim is that Schumer wanted Biden to step down because of his age. lapucelle Tuesday #47

You're obviously looking to pick an argument SocialDemocrat61 Tuesday #48

Very improper semantics mr715 Tuesday #8

It's the Times. Improper semantics is what they do. Scrivener7 Tuesday #11

"It's the Times" mr715 Tuesday #12

Well done. Scrivener7 Tuesday #13

Schumer is a loser. He thinks it's 1989 and we're up against Bob Dole. F this guy. 617Blue Tuesday #10

A Loser? F Him? MineralMan Tuesday #22

Mitchell, Reid, Daschle - he's a shell compared to those guys. He's not a war time consigliere. 617Blue Tuesday #31

I think you hit the nail . . . Scubamatt Tuesday #35

Hope it's the first step toward a big win in 2026, and not a big fizzle and blown chance. Silent Type Tuesday #14

Good. Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #18

Post removed Post removed Tuesday #23

Meanwhile, Chuck, in the real world ... usonian Tuesday #26

We should criticize each other in private, Democrats fighting is never a good thing Walleye Tuesday #27

It's a national political party. There is no private. Scrivener7 Tuesday #28

Maybe you are right but these kind of divisions in the party always benefit Republicans Walleye Tuesday #29

Divisions are hopefully remedied by elections. nt mr715 Tuesday #32

I am also hoping right with you. I've seen it fall apart before though Walleye Tuesday #34

Sometimes these "stories" are meant to motivate leftstreet Tuesday #30

Thank god jaymac Tuesday #33

Good. GaYellowDawg Tuesday #37

Here are OnTheIssues.org ideology infographics for all 7 senators listed: 5 "liberal" and 2 "establishment". lapucelle Tuesday #38

The issue with Schumer isn't ideological imo fujiyamasan Tuesday #39

You've missed the point. Scrivener7 Tuesday #41

Actually, no I haven't missed the point. I read the NYT's anonymously sourced lapucelle Tuesday #45

Well, no. But you have a lovely evening. Scrivener7 Tuesday #46

It's important that he understands that this isn't 2005 themaguffin Tuesday #42

So! What's the big "challenge"? MorbidButterflyTat Wednesday #49