Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Left Turn Only

(74 posts)
17. Cost of Running a Great Country
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 11:48 AM
Dec 2012

At least half the people in this country drive me over sanity's cliff. Few people seem to realize all the things that are needed by what the federal government does. The conservative drumbeat to cut the size of the federal government benefits only the wealthy because they don't need public services nearly as much as the common person. Controlling outbreaks of disease, protecting the food supply, tracking dangerous storms, maintaining and building infrastructure, and helping state governments are only a few of the necessary things that our federal government is doing for us every day. These things cost money, and the costs of everything keeps going up, so it is only logical that the costs of government have to keep going up with inflation; yet, conservatives have many Americans believing that we should cut taxes and spending -- a double whammy when it comes to providing the myriad things needed by the people. Do people realize how much their state and local taxes would have to go up if the federal government stopped helping with the costs of education, and that's just one thing; this is what Libertarians fail to mention to people when they talk about "freeing us" from the federal government. Imagine if state and local governments had to pay for all the things mentioned above along with Social Security, Medicare, and all the other things provided by the federal government and the people as a nation. Since the costs of what is needed to run a great country only keep rising along with everything else, then we need more revenue as time passes, not less. Unless we are going to create a whole new economic system that is not based on consumption and ever-increasing profits, this is a reality we all have to face.

The Bush tax cuts were never paid for and were put in place to necessitate the cutting of the social programs that the wealthy have hated ever since FDR. If we don't end ALL the Bush tax-cuts, deficit spending will only continue to rise. While Social Security is doing fine right now, it will not pay all the needed costs in the future with the graying of America, and we will never be able to control health costs as long as corporations control health care. In any event, as Tom has said, we need more revenue, not less, and we as a people have to pay for what we want.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Congress is NOT ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #1
Without resorting to speculation about the future; the Republican House is. Tom Rinaldo Dec 2012 #2
Tom, I want to ask you the same question I just asked RKP. Just a yes or plethoro Dec 2012 #3
No, I don't. Maybe if the debt ceiling isn't raised something could happen to S.S. checks Tom Rinaldo Dec 2012 #5
Thanks...........nft plethoro Dec 2012 #13
I think you are correct because Social Security, Medicare and Veterans Benefits are exempted Samantha Dec 2012 #21
Not ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #6
Thanks........nft plethoro Dec 2012 #14
NO Angry Dragon Dec 2012 #18
Thanks. It's your caveat that concerns me.......nft plethoro Dec 2012 #29
The republican House is not congress ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #4
Not to be a stickler, but Pelosi already called Chained CPI "strengthening Social Security" Tom Rinaldo Dec 2012 #10
Mind if I send this to my Congressman? obxhead Dec 2012 #7
Absolutely. n/t Tom Rinaldo Dec 2012 #11
You can't deny that we have spending problems socialindependocrat Dec 2012 #8
Sure, but humans are rarely capable of absolute efficiency. Tom Rinaldo Dec 2012 #12
Of course it is n2doc Dec 2012 #9
Actually, I think we have a deficit problem... Lefty Thinker Dec 2012 #15
This is why we need COMPLETE CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM! We need OUR representative Dustlawyer Dec 2012 #16
Cost of Running a Great Country Left Turn Only Dec 2012 #17
This should be it's own OP. Tom Rinaldo Dec 2012 #20
Actually, Social Security was never designed to live off Social Security taxes jmowreader Dec 2012 #24
That's exactly what I said: ProfessionalLeftist Dec 2012 #19
but to believe it is a revenue problem... mostlyconfused Dec 2012 #22
So Your Argument Is DallasNE Dec 2012 #25
No, not arguing that, just trying to have a realistic conversation mostlyconfused Dec 2012 #30
But You Are The One Making That Argument Then DallasNE Dec 2012 #31
Starting Point: Those who defend permanetly giving tax cuts to the rich can't demand austerity... Tom Rinaldo Dec 2012 #27
Of Course It Is A Revenue Problem DallasNE Dec 2012 #23
Excellent. Thanks. freshwest Dec 2012 #26
of course it's a revenue problem. that's why they keep denying it. unblock Dec 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It Sure As Hell IS A Reve...»Reply #17