General Discussion

AllaN01Bear

(29,326 posts)

22. ""

Reply to Bread and Circuses (Original post)

Wed Mar 18, 2026, 07:30 PM

19 hrs ago

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mutiny ?? USS Gerald R. Ford [View all] Bread and Circuses 21 hrs ago OP

Interesting... 2naSalit 21 hrs ago #1

Exactly. These sailors may feel that they are on a floating disaster Bread and Circuses 21 hrs ago #4

At the very least. ...nt 2naSalit 21 hrs ago #6

And Trump is stupid enough to demand that the carrier position itself in the middle of the Straits. OAITW r.2.0 18 hrs ago #26

The bathrooms were broken before deployment. Nt Fiendish Thingy 20 hrs ago #13

ABC... spanone 21 hrs ago #2

Our modern day edhopper 21 hrs ago #3

Violation of Article 94 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice can result in the death penalty... PeaceWave 21 hrs ago #5

What about refusing to carry out illegal orders? malaise 20 hrs ago #10

Couldn't they have refused the orders without setting fire to the ship? Qutzupalotl 43 min ago #48

Yeah, not a good try there. Kingofalldems 20 hrs ago #18

Now do UNLAWFUL military orders. blm 18 hrs ago #28

Exactly! canetoad 14 hrs ago #45

Key words there are "lawful military orders." wnylib 15 hrs ago #39

Can you define "unlawful orders"? Ruby the Liberal 6 hrs ago #47

Who wants to go to war at the behest of a known pedophile and rapist? roamer65 21 hrs ago #7

Guardian link malaise 20 hrs ago #8

The military I was in was fueled by: coffee, hot sauce, "griping",........and porn underpants 20 hrs ago #9

"The military I was in was fueled by: coffee, hot sauce, "griping",........and porn" Codifer 18 hrs ago #32

This same guy posted AI slop of the Ford severely aflame rictofen 20 hrs ago #11

I'm sure it was what you were getting at, just pointing it out for those not familiar InstantGratification 18 hrs ago #30

Any other source besides some guy's blog? Nt Fiendish Thingy 20 hrs ago #12

See #8 n/t malaise 20 hrs ago #15

The status of the aircraft carrier is widely know, but not the mutiny/sabotage accusation. Brother Buzz 20 hrs ago #16

Thanks malaise 20 hrs ago #17

Look at post 11 InstantGratification 18 hrs ago #33

Possible, not unheard of. UTUSN 20 hrs ago #14

This sounds like the USS Bonhomme Richard case - which resulted in an acquittal... PeaceWave 19 hrs ago #19

This message was self-deleted by its author AllaN01Bear 19 hrs ago #20

My military law experience is limited to the Army but I'd be surprised to see mutiny charges. TomSlick 19 hrs ago #21

IF - this turns out to be true stopdiggin 19 hrs ago #24

"" AllaN01Bear 19 hrs ago #22

I remember hearing things post Vietnam Dan 19 hrs ago #23

Assuming this is true, why would we possibly need to defend mutinous arsonists? Renew Deal 19 hrs ago #25

Another former military member Dan 18 hrs ago #29

What good would the word of civilians do anyway? MorbidButterflyTat 15 hrs ago #41

I have been wondering if the generals and officers would begin to refuse to serve? ShazamIam 18 hrs ago #27

Who the hell really knows? ... littlemissmartypants 18 hrs ago #31

Get them off the ship OC375 18 hrs ago #34

There were straws in the wind last week irisblue 18 hrs ago #35

1972 Height of Vietnam. My F-4 squadron was assigned to the USS Forrestal... Wounded Bear 18 hrs ago #36

At sea shifts are 12 on, 12 off with no rest days. Tbear 16 hrs ago #37

I'm going to crap all over this theory... jmowreader 16 hrs ago #38

From a friend as well as a documentary on submarine life Melon 15 hrs ago #44

Improper maintenance due to fatigue/low morale, not sabotage is certainly a very real possibility. /nt artemisia1 14 hrs ago #46

I doubt it LogDog75 15 hrs ago #40

As an ex-sailor I don't believe anyone would try such a dumb stunt. GoodRaisin 15 hrs ago #42

The laundry area of any ship is prone to fires. Melon 15 hrs ago #43