Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarisataka

(22,688 posts)
37. How do we know he is dead?
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 11:06 PM
15 hrs ago

It could have been done with a squib, the gun loaded with blanks and they planted a bullet to make it look like he was shot
The shooter was paid to confess and promised the case would get tossed.
Kirk is in hiding somewhere

If we are going with crazy theories, let's go all-in

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I thought this was fishy from the start. n/t rzemanfl 17 hrs ago #1
Defense lawyer claims client is innocent EdmondDantes_ 17 hrs ago #2
Is there a grassy knoll around somewhere? Ocelot II 17 hrs ago #3
Patsy dweller 17 hrs ago #4
This was a professional hit...................... Lovie777 17 hrs ago #5
Yup, it certainly was blue-wave 16 hrs ago #29
This is your brain on conspiracy theories. nt BootinUp 17 hrs ago #6
Thank you ! stopdiggin 17 hrs ago #11
People still don't believe the Warren commission even after the shooting BootinUp 17 hrs ago #13
there is no end to the lunacy that the 'conspiracy brain' will gobble up .... - - - - -(nt)- stopdiggin 17 hrs ago #18
So by saying "lunacy" blue-wave 1 hr ago #59
When I see evidence..... SergeStorms 50 min ago #62
Numerous people in the operating at the hospital saw that the back of Kennedy's head was blown off. everyonematters 16 hrs ago #27
you could see after he was shot Jackie trying to climb out the back of the convertible, as if chasing his head. Trueblue Texan 14 hrs ago #43
So we are supposed believe that blue-wave 1 hr ago #58
. BootinUp 24 sec ago #63
Oh Lawd, there's a budding cottage industry of conspiracy theories on the RW alone. underpants 17 hrs ago #21
I WISH somebody ELSE had had a 'good rifle'---- Jack Valentino 15 hrs ago #41
Like the tRump fake assasination attempt that went wrong I have no doubt. nt yaesu 17 hrs ago #7
a very neat trick - given that the shooter TOLD other people that did it stopdiggin 17 hrs ago #8
Why did they pin the murder Blue_Roses 17 hrs ago #9
He - a) confessed to roommate - b) stashed a rifle easily identified as belonging to him/family in nearby bushes stopdiggin 17 hrs ago #16
Weird Blue_Roses 17 hrs ago #20
Post removed Post removed 13 hrs ago #47
Oh boy... RockRaven 17 hrs ago #10
When ATF or some other forensic lab can't definitely match a bullet, they say so Prairie Gates 17 hrs ago #12
Exactly right. Straw Man 17 hrs ago #15
I did notice that the defense didn't say that the ATF dgauss 17 hrs ago #17
I haven't followed the story much rpannier 16 hrs ago #30
And so gentle readers, another conspiracy is born . . . Aussie105 16 hrs ago #35
Nope. Not a rabbit hole I'm going doen. Not for this guy. OAITW r.2.0 17 hrs ago #14
Hard to tell whether the defense is saying the bullet doesn't match the caliber of the rifle, or if it's pushing what WhiskeyGrinder 17 hrs ago #19
One of the many "marks matching" forensic "sciences" that is of dubious reliability Prairie Gates 17 hrs ago #23
Yep. Bite ID, blood spatter, fingerprints...whatever it takes to keep the PIC running. WhiskeyGrinder 17 hrs ago #25
Fire/burn/accelerant marks. Polygraphs. RockRaven 16 hrs ago #26
Carpet and fabric fibers Johnny2X2X 16 hrs ago #33
"Tool marks" and other nonsense pseudoscience Prairie Gates 5 hrs ago #52
It's a defense claim Renew Deal 17 hrs ago #22
Now watch them say that Charlie Kirk's bullet matches Luigi Mangione's gun... PeaceWave 17 hrs ago #24
My guess is that the bullet hit something hard after passing thru Kirk's neck NickB79 16 hrs ago #28
The only evidence we should care about are vague engravings on bullets IronLionZion 16 hrs ago #31
Trump wanted this to be federal case. Wonder why? 33taw 16 hrs ago #32
Wow. More questions than answers. Joinfortmill 16 hrs ago #34
What questions? Aussie105 16 hrs ago #36
Amazing deduction. Joinfortmill 5 hrs ago #50
How do we know he is dead? sarisataka 15 hrs ago #37
Crazy theories? Let's go! Danascot 5 hrs ago #49
COLOR. ME. SHOCKED. MrChuck 15 hrs ago #38
My theory that Erika had something to do with it still stands. Initech 2 hrs ago #56
Probably means bullet was too damaged to be able to match it to the rifle Kaleva 15 hrs ago #39
A nice, sensible response to this new evidence. Ilikepurple 14 hrs ago #44
Good! Unrepentant Fenian 15 hrs ago #40
Shocking. C Moon 15 hrs ago #42
is there a link to the court filing? onenote 13 hrs ago #45
I've been looking, and everything points back to the DailyMail. usonian 13 hrs ago #46
Below is a link to CBS news Quiet Em 6 hrs ago #48
Lawyer being a lawyer Johnny2X2X 5 hrs ago #51
It was a fragment Historic NY 3 hrs ago #53
Ahhh, cooler heads BaronChocula 1 hr ago #60
That's a rough row to hoe given that the suspect confessed the murder to allegorical oracle 3 hrs ago #54
Uh oh, this is going to disrupt Fox News' narrative. Initech 2 hrs ago #55
It was an inside job. idahoblue 2 hrs ago #57
I actually hope it doesn't match. Iggo 1 hr ago #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bullet used to kill Charl...»Reply #37