Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why I didn't listen... [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)174. The Change They Believe In
Speech for Harlem Tenants Association, November 14, 2008
By Robert Fitch
EXCERPT...
If we examine more carefully the interests that Obama represents; if we look at his core financial supporters; as well as his inmost circle of advisors, well see that they represent the primary activists in the demolition movement and the primary real estate beneficiaries of this transformation of public housing projects into condos and townhouses: the profitable creep of the Central Business District and elite residential neighborhoods southward; and the shifting of the pile of human misery about three miles further into the South Side and the south suburbs.
Obamas political base comes primarily from Chicago FIREthe finance, insurance and real estate industry. And the wealthiest familiesthe Pritzkers, the Crowns and the Levins. But its more than just Chicago FIRE. Also within Obamas inner core of support are allies from the non-profit sector: the liberal foundations, the elite universities, the non-profit community developers and the real estate reverends who produce market rate housing with tax breaks from the city and who have been known to shout from the pulpit give us this day our Daley, Richard Daley bread.3
Aggregate them and what emerges is a constellation of interests around Obama that I call Friendly FIRE. Fire power disguised by the camouflage of community uplift; augmented by the authority of academia; greased by billions in foundation grants; and wired to conventional FIRE by the terms of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1995.
And yet friendly FIRE is just as deadly as the conventional FIRE that comes from bankers and developers that were used to ducking from. Its the whole condominium of interests whose advancement depends on the elimination of poor blacks from the community and their replacement by white people andat least temporarilyby the black middle classwhove gotten subprime mortgagesin a kind of redlining in reverse.
CONTINUED...
The late Mr. Fitch may be related to a commie third-cousin of my old college roommate's first girlfriend. It still doesn't change the facts behind this speech.
By Robert Fitch
EXCERPT...
If we examine more carefully the interests that Obama represents; if we look at his core financial supporters; as well as his inmost circle of advisors, well see that they represent the primary activists in the demolition movement and the primary real estate beneficiaries of this transformation of public housing projects into condos and townhouses: the profitable creep of the Central Business District and elite residential neighborhoods southward; and the shifting of the pile of human misery about three miles further into the South Side and the south suburbs.
Obamas political base comes primarily from Chicago FIREthe finance, insurance and real estate industry. And the wealthiest familiesthe Pritzkers, the Crowns and the Levins. But its more than just Chicago FIRE. Also within Obamas inner core of support are allies from the non-profit sector: the liberal foundations, the elite universities, the non-profit community developers and the real estate reverends who produce market rate housing with tax breaks from the city and who have been known to shout from the pulpit give us this day our Daley, Richard Daley bread.3
Aggregate them and what emerges is a constellation of interests around Obama that I call Friendly FIRE. Fire power disguised by the camouflage of community uplift; augmented by the authority of academia; greased by billions in foundation grants; and wired to conventional FIRE by the terms of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1995.
And yet friendly FIRE is just as deadly as the conventional FIRE that comes from bankers and developers that were used to ducking from. Its the whole condominium of interests whose advancement depends on the elimination of poor blacks from the community and their replacement by white people andat least temporarilyby the black middle classwhove gotten subprime mortgagesin a kind of redlining in reverse.
CONTINUED...
The late Mr. Fitch may be related to a commie third-cousin of my old college roommate's first girlfriend. It still doesn't change the facts behind this speech.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
200 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I agree! Why doesn't the President ever go to the Bully Pulpit? Oh, wait...
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2012
#1
And just when you think that the essay on why he wasn't going to listen to the SOTU
Number23
Jan 2012
#180
That's what the President's speech would have sounded like to me so I didn't bother...
ddeclue
Jan 2012
#7
Alan Grayson is running for CONGRESS already and he will be campaigning for Barack Obama.
phleshdef
Jan 2012
#32
I know Alan personally and worked on his campaign for Congress and will do so again this year
ddeclue
Jan 2012
#36
Yeah because helping Obama not win will do so much good for the Progressive cause.
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#39
And I just bet we-are-on-a-first-name-basis-Alan will REALLY appreciate those votes for him for Pres
renie408
Jan 2012
#43
LOL. Yea, you are SO going to punish him. He won't nor will he ever know you exist...
phleshdef
Jan 2012
#49
President Obama does or he wouldn't be running as fast as he can to the left with his speeches.
ddeclue
Jan 2012
#60
"Boo hoo" is very fitting for you as you engage in political emo-ism masquerading as progressivism.
phleshdef
Jan 2012
#109
Obama doesn't personally owe you shit. The arrogant ME ME ME shit is not progressive.
phleshdef
Jan 2012
#48
Yawn.. he actually DOES owe me everything.. he is an elected official which makes him an employee of
ddeclue
Jan 2012
#58
My, my, my, me, me, me. You think you are the only god damn person in this country obviously.
phleshdef
Jan 2012
#63
Boo hoo.. if the President wants MY support then he needs to take ME seriously.
ddeclue
Jan 2012
#86
Dude seriously, this is the reason the progressive revolution will never materialize.
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#77
I'll bet Newt or Mitt would take you seriously. Maybe Ron Paul, too!
Old and In the Way
Jan 2012
#76
Hey, if you knew him, you know, PERSONALLY, couldn't you just call him Ron? Or Paul?
renie408
Jan 2012
#118
No it is YOU who has the grossly inflated sense of self-importance who thinks he has the right to
ddeclue
Jan 2012
#84
Why don't you just vote for Newt or Shitt and avoid the middleman and the subterfuge?
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Jan 2012
#114
So then you should know that Grayson is also a DUer. I'm guessing he would not rec this thread.
Hugabear
Jan 2012
#130
You missed is repeating "I'm going to send a bill to congress" over and over.
uppityperson
Jan 2012
#22
He's not progressive. Never was. Never said he was. Didn't campaign as one. Will never be.
Honeycombe8
Jan 2012
#8
I cannot be the only person who finds that line of 'reasoning' just totally batshit. n/t
renie408
Jan 2012
#87
that shows you really don't respect your own political power if you don't understand that reasoning.
ddeclue
Jan 2012
#100
That's too bad. Obama gave the best State of the Union speech in my lifetime.
JDPriestly
Jan 2012
#11
yawn.. I'll wait for him to ACTUALLY fight..not just waste my time with "fighting words"...
ddeclue
Jan 2012
#25
do you still believe these speeches? I respect you and your posts, well, that's what I know of you
xiamiam
Jan 2012
#81
My prediction for tonight: Obama delivers the most Leftist speech in 70 years,
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#12
Really? On what issues/policies were they more progressive on? I'll play along.
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#34
Yeah and imagine Obama creating a WPA or SS but excluded all white people.
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#128
YOU can't name a president who was actually more of a baseline progressive as Obama is- lololololol
stockholmer
Jan 2012
#29
oh brilliant.. that's the best you can do? Guilt by association that isn't even valid?
ddeclue
Jan 2012
#23
YES!! DAMMIT! I want a PROGRESSIVE who PROGRESSIVELY and SINGLEHANDEDLY defeats the
renie408
Jan 2012
#35
Hey!! Look! You have a big ole thread all to yourself!! And you get to reply and argue and
renie408
Jan 2012
#46
It's worth remembering, in contrast to the two vetoes issued by Obama, FDR vetoed 635 bills.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2012
#113
I'm already voting for the guy so I don't need to watch his campaign speeches.
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2012
#40
Buffet isn't a lawyer in a law firm, he's the second richest man in the world.
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2012
#57
well I'm glad you've got THAT under control.. have you considered an anti-anxiety med?
ddeclue
Jan 2012
#62
I didnt listen either..and I'm offended by those who think this is a new day.He is a great speaker
xiamiam
Jan 2012
#66
there was a preg woman that needed a seat and there was no way in hell you were going to get off
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#74
i am on my fire. i cant find the thread. something about be nice to preg women
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#111
Thanks...OK, I think I understand the poster better. It puts this whole OP in perspective.
Old and In the Way
Jan 2012
#127
No politics is NOT JUST about winning... it is about winning without compromising core principles.
ddeclue
Jan 2012
#110
PEOPLE!! Stop feeding it!! Maybe if we do, it will go bother the neighbors....n/t
renie408
Jan 2012
#93
As a start, maybe a President Grayson would not have appointed the Goldman Sachs personnel.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2012
#125
"Bully Pulpit!! Pretty Speech!! Bully Pulpit!! Pretty Speech!! Bully Pulpit!! Pretty Speech!!
JoePhilly
Jan 2012
#160