Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: President Obama Richly Deserves to Be Dumped [View all]cali
(114,904 posts)127. when someone says that it's a strong clue that they don't know enough about individual congress
critters. Dennis is by no stretch of the imagination the only one speaking out. Thankfully.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
255 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

What an indictment you just made of the broken system, unintentionally I'm sure, we live under.
sabrina 1
Dec 2011
#18
Yes. With the Citizen's United decision in place, only candidates sanctioned by the 1%
Zorra
Dec 2011
#122
Very true, judging from what I saw from inside the Kucinich campaign in 2004
Lydia Leftcoast
Dec 2011
#150
Unintentionally, you know, you just described Obama's 2008 presidential platform...
RandomKoolzip
Dec 2011
#240
when someone says that it's a strong clue that they don't know enough about individual congress
cali
Dec 2011
#127
DK is fine as an obscure House member - he is just not presidential material.
banned from Kos
Dec 2011
#157
He IS presidential material and was the most popular candidate for that office
sabrina 1
Dec 2011
#161
Well, I don't want to argue but you wrote your post with passion and conviction.
banned from Kos
Dec 2011
#179
Al Gore is Mr. DLC himself. Remember its the Clinton machine that spawned the "Blue Dogs".
Erose999
Dec 2011
#74
Those are viable choices. And electable if there was a chance of them running.
GoneOffShore
Dec 2011
#148
well, of course there's no chance- every single pol you mentioned supports Obama , even Bernie.
Capn Sunshine
Dec 2011
#214
Obama has succeeded in killing a lot more of our dedicated enemies than Bush did.
olegramps
Dec 2011
#250
the Democratic Party isn't going to nominate anyone outside of the establishment, actually
paulk
Dec 2011
#46
You are eliding so much history with the statement that "after this challenge
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2011
#28
You allege that, because McCarthy mounted his challenge to LBJ, we ended up
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2011
#44
Since you're fond of referencing Wikipedia, I'd like to point you to another Wikipedia article:
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2011
#65
Bingo. ....almost every credible poltiical scientist now argues that Humphrey would have defeated
MADem
Dec 2011
#98
Under this reasoning, if Gingrich had a "(D)" after his name, would you support him?
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2011
#71
Obama is doing a damn fine job of being a President GinGrinch himself. NDAA, the continuing of
Erose999
Dec 2011
#77
LBJ lost the presidency by pushing civil rights legislation through congress, ending the nearly 40
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2011
#153
It's all about what John R MacArthur wants to happen. Hidden deep in his mind.
LiberalFighter
Dec 2011
#246
I'm kinda unhappy with Obama & the current batch of Dems. I've made no secret of it.
Jackpine Radical
Dec 2011
#10
I guess I'm looking outside "politics as usual" to find my agents of change.
Jackpine Radical
Dec 2011
#91
Wake up people ...they don't give a fuck about us. Poor people don't finance political campaigns.
L0oniX
Dec 2011
#12
If all poor people voted it would be a slam dunk for the dems every four years and we would still
demosincebirth
Dec 2011
#16
No, but the landscape is the same - unpopular U.S. military offenses, mass civil uprisings ...
T S Justly
Dec 2011
#38
Humphrey could have been elected if he would have chosen to oppose the war, or say that he did.
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2011
#75
Humphry was a good man, but he would not take a public position contrary to the war hawks.
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2011
#114
No, thanks. Name a challenger and I'll work even harder to support President Obama.
NYC Liberal
Dec 2011
#41
I'm not speaking for anyone else; only for me. I haven't said "Do you want President Newt."
NYC Liberal
Dec 2011
#103
This seems to be different he has the "overwhelming support of the liberal base of the party"
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2011
#115
right or wrong, good or bad - there is not even a .00001% chance that it is going to happen
Douglas Carpenter
Dec 2011
#42
If I could recommend a reply, it would be this one. I will wish with you.
LiberalAndProud
Dec 2011
#110
Funny--When someone asked me why I thought O had shown no interest in taking on the MIC,
Jackpine Radical
Dec 2011
#255
Don't Compare Obama To The Almighty. Compare Him To The Alternative.
DemocratSinceBirth
Dec 2011
#51
You Do Know The Next President Will Be Barack Obama Or His Republican Opponent
DemocratSinceBirth
Dec 2011
#248
He does, but there is no alternative. The only person who can beat him isn't interested.
Tatiana
Dec 2011
#69
I dunno about the primary challenge, but Obama does remind me of Carter in some ways.
bemildred
Dec 2011
#79
Anyone who was voting against the war wouldn't, and didn't, vote for Nixon or Humphrey.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2011
#169
good one. "no one except Fox News promised he would be a liberal dream once in office"
certainot
Dec 2011
#186
According to Turley the ONLY pro-civil liberties candidate is the LIBERTARIAN Ron Paul!
alp227
Dec 2011
#126
While replacing obama may or may not be a good idea with a more liberal democratic
cstanleytech
Dec 2011
#130
Its not that Obama has refused solutions because he has its that the republicans stonewall him and
cstanleytech
Dec 2011
#158
Yup they controlled them but not enough to totally block the republicans from
cstanleytech
Dec 2011
#172
Eugene McCarthy's protege and heir: Darcy Richardson 2012- The only game in town to dump Obama
Hart2008
Dec 2011
#168
The Progressive Democrat running for President of the United States of America! NT
Hart2008
Dec 2011
#215
"i can't believe all the recs, must be a lot of folks not paying attention.... or trolls..."
Number23
Dec 2011
#202
Keep in mind that over 70% of Americans thought Saddam was behind 9/11 at one point
Cali_Democrat
Dec 2011
#226
cali dem is right- there's a difference - the US is aggressively misinformed starting with a radio
certainot
Dec 2011
#232
Go for it...Primary this President...or let him lose for lack of support...
Ivywoods55
Dec 2011
#199
My first thought on reading article was remembering that McCarthy didn't get nominated...
Mimosa
Dec 2011
#234
McCarthy was a perennial joke like Nader. This is fringe nonsense bullshit. Find the planet.
RBInMaine
Dec 2011
#238