Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

aikoaiko

(34,211 posts)
28. I don't think you should have to miss them, but....
Sat Feb 2, 2013, 07:26 PM
Feb 2013


..., and I say this with all sincerity, the 2nd protects a civil liberty like the other Bill of Rights.

I believe the you should care about banning some firearms the way I should care about:
* Manning being denied a speedy trial even though I wouldn't be denied one for a crime.
* Habeas corpus being denied people in Gitmo even though I won't be there.
* No warrant wire taps on calls to non US residents even though I don't make phone calls to other nations.

I can live with laws and regulations, even new laws, to reduce gun violence, but I do not support bans that would do nothing to reduce killings. AR style rifles will still be available new, but with a different grip and handguard (maybe). Multiple ten round mags will produce horrific shootings, but there are so many millions of 30 round mags that they won't be difficult to acquire.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Of Children and of Guns. [View all] Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2013 OP
I'll give you a kick aikoaiko Feb 2013 #1
I hear what you are saying, but consider.... Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2013 #3
Why should you miss them? Crepuscular Feb 2013 #5
Except you'd probably actively use your Porshe every day. Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2013 #7
It depends Crepuscular Feb 2013 #12
I have to run to a 4 hour meeting, but I will get back to you. aikoaiko Feb 2013 #6
I don't think you should have to miss them, but.... aikoaiko Feb 2013 #28
Frankly Guns are terrible writers in general el_bryanto Feb 2013 #2
Sorry, whoosh....nt Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2013 #4
kickinf times 1000. Whovian Feb 2013 #8
Thanks. Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2013 #26
Here is a Sandy Hook father who is still against gun-control. GreenStormCloud Feb 2013 #9
"the problem is not gun laws, the problem is a lack of civility" the father says marions ghost Feb 2013 #10
His views are just as valid as the anti-gun parents. GreenStormCloud Feb 2013 #23
For starters, you're going to have to learn how to talk to the people you're trying to reach. beevul Feb 2013 #11
Oh, please. Matthew 7:3, beevul. Robb Feb 2013 #13
I wasn't belittling anyone, robb. beevul Feb 2013 #16
nicely written, thanks Duckhunter935 Feb 2013 #14
You said: Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2013 #17
Yes, I did. beevul Feb 2013 #20
I enjoyed your OP. I think it brought some interesting points to the conversation. AtheistCrusader Feb 2013 #27
"Heads Would Explode"? Paladin Feb 2013 #19
Do you need help with reading comprension paladin? beevul Feb 2013 #21
There is no firearm mild enough to fire at a child without horrific consequences. AtheistCrusader Feb 2013 #24
Kick Recursion Feb 2013 #15
Good luck, Sir. PLARS1999 Feb 2013 #18
Well thought out , well written. Zax2me Feb 2013 #22
Thanks. nt Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2013 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Of Children and of Guns.»Reply #28