Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Wow... It Gets WAAAY Worse... 'Whom Can The President Kill ?' - TheNewYorker (We Are Now Nixon) [View all]
WHOM CAN THE PRESIDENT KILL?Posted by Amy Davidson - TheNewYorker
February 6, 2013

About a third of the way into in a Department of Justice white paper explaining why and when the President can kill American citizens, there is a citation that should give a reader pause. It comes in a section in which the author of the document, which was given to members of the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary committees last yearand obtained by Michael Isikoff, of NBC, on Mondaysays that this power extends into every country in the world other than the United States, well beyond those where we are engaged in hostilities. The reference is to an address that John R. Stevenson, a State Department legal adviser, gave before the Association of the Bar in New York in May, 1970, to justify the Nixon Administrations incursion into Cambodia. Does that make everyone, or anyone, feel better about what the Obama Administration has decided it can do, or the extent to which it thought through the implications, unintended consequences, precedents, and random reckless damage it may be delivering with this policy?
More: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2013/02/the-release-of-a-doj-white-paper-about-targeted-killings.html




74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Wow... It Gets WAAAY Worse... 'Whom Can The President Kill ?' - TheNewYorker (We Are Now Nixon) [View all]
WillyT
Feb 2013
OP
Beg to differ, alas! One of my best summers was spent watching the Watergate Hearings! Oh, and
WinkyDink
Feb 2013
#21
Was it worth it to have Nixon/Ford/Reagan/bush/Bush and possibly Bush,jeb in 2016?
graham4anything
Feb 2013
#58
This article states that the policy goes back to the Nixon Administration, but guess what?....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#11
Hmmm. I thought we were talking about the US policy of overseas assassinations....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#44
Exactly my point. Thanks for seeing it. Can't just blame the President for this policy. nt.
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#45
Because if it was bad when dealing with foreign entities we were at war with
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2013
#50
Have you lost all sense of reason? "They did it too" is what children say to excuse their bad acts.
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2013
#65
It's morally acceptable to me to not have to send in US troops to do the same job....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#46
Unless the 6th Amendment has been rewritten in the last few seconds, the 6th Amendment....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#69
Cambodia was one of the articles of impeachment against Nixon (in committee)
cthulu2016
Feb 2013
#17
Because they've bought the Fear Propaganda. "In An Emergency, Shred This Document."
WinkyDink
Feb 2013
#24
How can we be sure this is not used in the US against any group deemed a terrorist organization?
dkf
Feb 2013
#27
This may come as a surprise to a lot of people, but we've been in a state of....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#71