General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm a loyal member of the Democratic Party and I don't have a problem with Drones [View all]reACTIONary
(6,658 posts)...which was violated by the Nazis. The concentration camps were a crime against humanity. Since that is the case the question of "due process" under the laws of the state isn't very relevant.
In American jurisprudence "natural law" or "human rights" is conceived of as "substantive due process", which is a judicial concept that is related to, but different from, the constitutional concept of mere "due process". "Due process" is in accordance with the laws of the state, "substantive due process" is in accordance with the higher law of natural or human rights.
In my experience, references to "due process" in discussions of drone attacks, assassination attempts, extra judicial killings, etc are referring to the constitutional requirement of acting in accordance with the law and thus are not making the much stronger claim that the act constitutes a crime against humanity.
I don't think that the drone attacks we have been discussing constitute crimes against humanity. I think they are pretty much just simple acts of war. And it is a war that has been authorized under the laws of our nation. If the argument is that they are crimes against humanity, the stronger terminology should be used since "due process" is a weak concept in comparison.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):